Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022120›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2018

Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it.

John Brazier, Donna Rowen, Milad Karimi, Tessa Peasgood, Aki Tsuchiya, Julie Ratcliffe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of health state utility values for older people with acute myeloid leukaemia.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Time trade-off health state utility values for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Nothing about us, without us? A reflection on and call for involving children in the process of valuing child health.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  6. Surgical prioritization based on decision model outcomes is not sensitive to differences between the health-related quality of life values estimates of physicians and citizens.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An experience- and preference-based EQ-5D-3L value set derived using 18 months of longitudinal data in patients who sustained a fracture: results from the ICUROS.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Observational
  10. Hypothetical versus experienced health state valuation: a qualitative study of adult general public views and preferences.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The QALY is ableist: on the unethical implications of health states worse than dead.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Valuing EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment: Do Adult and Adolescent Preferences Differ?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using EQ-5D Data to Measure Hospital Performance: Are General Population Values Distorting Patients' Choices?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John BrazierSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Donna RowenSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. d.rowen@sheffield.ac.uk.
Milad KarimiSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Tessa PeasgoodSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Aki TsuchiyaSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Julie RatcliffeInstitute for Choice, School of Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the estimation of population value sets for health state classification systems such as the EuroQOL five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), there is increasing interest in asking respondents to value their own health state, sometimes referred to as "experience-based utility values" or, more correctly, own rather than hypothetical health states. Own health state values differ to hypothetical health state values, and this may be attributable to many reasons. This paper critically examines whose values matter; why there is a difference between own and hypothetical values; how to measure own health state values; and why to use own health state values. Finally, the paper examines other ways that own health state values can be taken into account, such as including the use of informed general population preferences that may better take into account experience-based values.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesExperience-based utilityHypothetical health state valuesInformed preferencesOwn health state valuation

Identifiers

PMID29022120
PMCPMC6008352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.