Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29022057›Full record

SynthesisDer Orthopade2017

Multiple cannulated screws vs. dynamic hip screws for femoral neck fractures : A meta-analysis.

Lei Lei Zhang, Ying Zhang, Xianghao Ma, Youwen Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Der Orthopade, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Sliding hip screws versus cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Early mechanical failure patterns after femoral neck fixation with the femoral neck system and dynamic hip screw.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Choose the appropriate implantation position of the Femoral Neck System in the femoral neck: a finite-element analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei Lei ZhangMedical Center of Hip, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, No. 82, South Qiming Road, 471002, Luoyang, China.
Ying ZhangMedical Center of Hip, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, No. 82, South Qiming Road, 471002, Luoyang, China.
Xianghao MaMedical Center of Hip, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, No. 82, South Qiming Road, 471002, Luoyang, China.
Youwen LiuMedical Center of Hip, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, No. 82, South Qiming Road, 471002, Luoyang, China. liuyouwenzhenggu@sina.com.
Luoyang Orthopedic-Traumatological Hospital of Henan Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVarious fixation devices have been reported for stabilization of femoral neck fractures. Numerous studies on arthroplasty versus internal fixation devices in the treatment of femoral neck fractures have been performed, but the optimal approach for internal fixation has not been analyzed.

methodsA meta-analysis and system evaluation were performed to compare clinical effects. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science

resultsIn this meta-analysis, 592 femoral neck fractures from 7 studies were assessed, and the meta-analysis results indicated significant differences in reoperation (RR 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.88, P = 0.008) and failure rate (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.10-4.72, P = 0.03), but no significant differences in the rate of postoperative complications between the MCS group and DHS group.

conclusionsDHS fixation has a larger skin incision and more soft tissue dissection, but it is associated with lower rates of fixation failure, reoperation, and overall rate of postoperative complications, and its use in elderly patients with osteoporosis is still recommended due to simplicity, efficacy, and high overall success rate. Multicenter RCTs with large samples are needed to better understand the comparative efficacy and safety of MCS and DHS in femoral neck fractures of restricted fracture type.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsCatheterizationFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationTreatment FailureFracture fixation, internalInternal fixatorsPostoperative complicationsReoperationTreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID29022057
OpenAlexW2764065582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.