Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29021919›Full record

ArticleESMO open2017

Safeguarding the future of independent, academic clinical cancer research in Europe for the benefit of patients.

Anastassia Negrouk, Denis Lacombe, Fatima Cardoso, Franck Morin, Eva Carrasco, Joan Maurel, Rudolf Maibach, Enrique Aranda, Richard Marais, Rolf A Stahel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The requirements of a specialist breast centre.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anastassia NegroukInternational Policy Office, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC),Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Denis LacombeDirector General, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
Fatima CardosoChampalimaud Cancer Center, Lisboa, Portugal.
Franck MorinFrench Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT) - Groupes Cooperateurs en Oncologie (GCO), Paris, France.
Eva CarrascoGrupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Mama (GEICAM), Scientific Director and CEO, Madrid, Spain.
Joan MaurelGrupo Espanol Multidisciplinar en Cancer Digestivo (GEMCAD), Medical OncologyDepartment, Hospital Clínic, Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeuticsin Solid Tumors Group, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rudolf MaibachInternational Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland.
Enrique ArandaSpanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), InstitutoSanitario de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Medical OncologyDepartment, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.
Richard MaraisEuropean Association for Cancer Research (EACR), Department of Molecular Oncology at the University of Manchester and Directorof the Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, UK.
Rolf A StahelEuropean Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Clinic of Oncology,University Hospital, Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17240Cancer Research UK 19279Cancer Research UK 22902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease that is constantly evolving. It is now the most common cause of death in Europe after cardiovascular diseases. There are inequalities among European countries, potentially unsustainable healthcare systems impacting quality of cancer care and increasing number of patients with cancer with rare conditions. Clinical and translational research are the backbone in establishing scientific advances as novel treatments and advancing progress to the benefit of patients. Commercially sponsored clinical trials are responsible for developing new medicines that can treat various disease areas, including cancer. It is important to note, however, that these clinical trials only assess the viability of compounds that are chosen by a commercial entity that funds the entire process. By their design and focus, these trials need to fulfil commercial interests and market expectations, which do not always coincide with patients' needs. As soon or even before novel treatments and compounds obtain formal market authorisation, academia will take these existing and new medicines to further conduct research in order to optimise their use, develop new combinations and with a strong focus on the patients and their needs. Established standard of care most commonly relies on clinical cancer research stemming from non-commercial entities, cooperative groups or academic clinical research. This article provides a consensus on the definition of academic research, illustrates its added value and suggests and calls to European Union institutions to support this type of research for the benefit of patients.

Indexed as

academic researchcancerindependent researchlegal framework

Identifiers

PMID29021919
PMCPMC5634488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.