Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29021727›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2017

Analgesia, sedation and arousal status in burn patients: the gap between recommendations and current practices.

A Lavrentieva, N Depetris, I Rodini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A LavrentievaPapanikolaou Hospital, Burn ICU, Exohi, Thessaloniki, Greece.
N DepetrisOrthopedic and Trauma Center A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Anaesthesia and ICU Department, Turin, Italy.
I RodiniOrthopedic and Trauma Center A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza, Anaesthesia and ICU Department, Turin, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITG. Papanikolaou General Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment and treatment of pain, agitation and delirium are integral parts of the management of critically ill patients. The purpose of this review is to describe how pain, delirium and agitation are managed in general intensive care units and in burn units, and to address whether management of these issues is compatible with internationally accepted recommendations. A substantial gap exists between the conception of the guidelines, clinical practice and physicians' statements regarding pain, sedation and delirium management. Specific training programs might be required to increase the implementation rate of guidelines and best practices on sedation, pain and delirium assessment and management in burn units.

Indexed as

analgesiaburnsdeliriumsedation

Identifiers

PMID29021727
PMCPMC5627552
OpenAlexW3024567934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.