Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29021722›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2017

Bacterial and antimicrobial susceptibility profile and the prevalence of sepsis among burn patients at the burn unit of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.

A Wardhana, R Djan, Z Halim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sepsis in burn care: incidence and outcomes.Military Medical Research · 2025
    Article
  2. [Efficiency and Usefulness of the Molecular Test 'BiofireAnnals of burns and fire disasters · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Anti-Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A WardhanaBurn Unit, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
R DjanBurn Unit, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Z HalimBurn Unit, Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among burn patients. An effective measure to reduce infection is routine monitoring of bacterial infection and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at the burn unit. This will help to create a burn centre-specific empirical antibiotic therapy protocol. A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted at the Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (RSCM) Burn Unit between September-November 2016. Data regarding bacterial culture isolates, antimicrobial susceptibility spectrum, and the number of burn patients diagnosed with sepsis were collected. There were 36 patients with positive bacterial cultures, with the isolates changing continuously between Klebsiella pneumonia (17%), Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (12%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (11%). High resistance was found for 10 antimicrobials, particularly cephalosporins. The three bacteria were only sensitive to carbapenem, aminoglycosides and tigecycline. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with sepsis (38.9%), 10 died. Two major sepsis-causing bacteria were P. aeruginosa (33.3%) and K. pneumoniae (28.9%). Bacterial isolates in our setting changed every month. Almost all bacterial isolates are multi-drug resistant, highly resistant to the empirical therapy given (ceftriaxone), leading to outbreaks of sepsis and increased mortality rates. Carbapenem (imipenem, meropenem and doripenem) and aminoglycosides (amikacin) combination was the selected empirical therapy.

Indexed as

antibiotic susceptibilityburn infectionmulti-drug resistancesepsis

Identifiers

PMID29021722
PMCPMC5627547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.