Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29021606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Higher Expression of Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4 in Blood Cells of Keratoconus Patiens.

Tomás Sobrino, Uxía Regueiro, Mercedes Malfeito, Alba Vieites-Prado, María Pérez-Mato, Francisco Campos, Isabel Lema

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Update on the Physiopathology of Keratoconus.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomás SobrinoClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. tomas.sobrino.moreiras@sergas.es.
Uxía RegueiroClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Mercedes MalfeitoClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alba Vieites-PradoClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María Pérez-MatoClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Francisco CamposClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Isabel LemaClinical Neurosciences Research Laboratory, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. mariaisabel.lema@usc.es.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation may play a significant role in Keratoconus (KC), but the implication of immunity on this inflammatory response is unknown. Therefore, our aim was to determine the expression levels of Toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) and 4 (TLR4) in monocytes and neutrophils from patients with KC and control subjects for demonstrating the role of innate immunity in KC. We also study the correlation between TLR2/TLR4 expression and serum levels of proinflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP-9 and NF-κB). Forty patients with bilateral KC (55% males; mean age; 33.1 ± 10.9 years) and 20 control subjects (55% males; mean age; 30.4 ± 7.6 years) were included in the study. Our results showed that mean expression of TLR2 and TLR4 in both neutrophils and monocytes was significantly higher in patients with KC compared to control subjects (all p < 0.0001). Furthermore, KC patients also showed higher serum levels of IL-1B, IL-6, TNF-α, MMP-9 (all p < 0.0001) and NF-κB (p = 0.036). In addition, we found a strong correlation between TLR2 expression in both monocytes and neutrophils (all p < 0.0001), and TLR4 in monocytes (all p < 0.05) with serum levels of IL-1B, IL-6, TNF-α and MMP-9. In conclusion, these findings suggest that TLRs may play an important role in the pathophysiology of KC.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBlood CellsFemaleHumansInflammation MediatorsKeratoconusMaleMonocytesNeutrophilsNF-kappa BSeverity of Illness IndexToll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4BiomarkersInflammation MediatorsNF-kappa BToll-Like Receptor 2Toll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID29021606
PMCPMC5636878
OpenAlexW2763092922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.