Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29021524›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Ecogenomics of virophages and their giant virus hosts assessed through time series metagenomics.

Simon Roux, Leong-Keat Chan, Rob Egan, Rex R Malmstrom, Katherine D McMahon, Matthew B Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Uncovering the hidden RNA virus diversity in Lake Nam Co: Evolutionary insights from an extreme high-altitude environment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Endogenous virophages are active and mitigate giant virus infection in the marine protistProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon RouxDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-5895
Leong-Keat ChanDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.
Rob EganDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.
Rex R MalmstromDepartment of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.
Katherine D McMahonDepartment of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Matthew B SullivanDepartment of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. sullivan.948@osu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virophages are small viruses that co-infect eukaryotic cells alongside giant viruses (Mimiviridae) and hijack their machinery to replicate. While two types of virophages have been isolated, their genomic diversity and ecology remain largely unknown. Here we use time series metagenomics to identify and study the dynamics of 25 uncultivated virophage populations, 17 of which represented by complete or near-complete genomes, in two North American freshwater lakes. Taxonomic analysis suggests that these freshwater virophages represent at least three new candidate genera. Ecologically, virophage populations are repeatedly detected over years and evolutionary stable, yet their distinct abundance profiles and gene content suggest that virophage genera occupy different ecological niches. Co-occurrence analyses reveal 11 virophages strongly associated with uncultivated Mimiviridae, and three associated with eukaryotes among the Dinophyceae, Rhizaria, Alveolata, and Cryptophyceae groups. Together, these findings significantly augment virophage databases, help refine virophage taxonomy, and establish baseline ecological hypotheses and tools to study virophages in nature.Virophages are recently-identified small viruses that infect larger viruses, yet their diversity and ecological roles are poorly understood. Here, Roux and colleagues present time series metagenomics data revealing new virophage genera and their putative ecological interactions in two freshwater lakes.

Indexed as

EcosystemMimiviridaeEukaryotaGenome, ViralLakesMetagenomeMetagenomicsVirophages

Identifiers

PMID29021524
PMCPMC5636890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.