Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29021413›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2017

CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy As First-line Treatments for Imaging-diagnosed Intracranial Meningiomas.

Yoshihiko Manabe, Taro Murai, Hiroyuki Ogino, Takeshi Tamura, Michio Iwabuchi, Yoshimasa Mori, Hiromitsu Iwata, Hirochika Suzuki, Yuta Shibamoto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stereotactic radiosurgery with CyberknifeThe Pan African medical journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshihiko ManabeDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences.
Taro MuraiDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences.
Hiroyuki OginoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center.
Takeshi TamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Suzuka Chuo General Hospital.
Michio IwabuchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yokohama CyberKnife Center.
Yoshimasa MoriDepartment of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Aichi Medical University.
Hiromitsu IwataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center.
Hirochika SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Tsushima City Hospital.
Yuta ShibamotoDepartment of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences.
Nagoya City University · JPNagoya Medical Center · JPAichi Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Definitive radiotherapy is an important alternative treatment for meningioma patients who are inoperable or refuse surgery. We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (hSRT) as first-line treatments for intracranial meningiomas that were diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT). Between February 2005 and September 2015, 41 patients with intracranial meningiomas were treated with CyberKnife-based SRS or hSRT. Eleven of those tumors were located in the skull base. The median tumor volume was 10.4 ml (range, 1.4-56.9 ml). The median prescribed radiation dose was 17 Gy (range, 13-20 Gy to the 61-88% isodose line) for SRS (n = 9) and 25 Gy (range, 14-38 Gy to the 44-83% isodose line) for hSRT (n = 32). The hSRT doses were delivered in 2 to 10 daily fractions. The median follow-up period was 49 months (range, 7-138). The 5-year progression-free survival rate (PFS) for all 41 patients was 86%. The 3-year PFS was 69% for the 14 patients with tumor volumes of ≥13.5 ml (30 mm in diameter) and 100% for the 27 patients with tumor volumes of <13.5 ml (P = 0.031). Grade >2 toxicities were observed in 5 patients (all of them had tumor volumes of ≥13.5 ml). SRS and hSRT are safe and effective against relatively small (<13.5 ml) meningiomas.

Indexed as

Dose Fractionation, RadiationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedRadiosurgeryRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCyberKnifehypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapymeningiomastereotactic radiosurgerystereotactic radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29021413
PMCPMC5735225
OpenAlexW2761542103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.