ArticleGenome research2017
Co-expression networks reveal the tissue-specific regulation of transcription and splicing.
Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
113 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Strategies for constructing context-specific protein-protein interaction networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic and phenotypic convergence of neurodevelopmental disorder risk genes in vitro and in vivo.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Beyond the mean: genetic control of gene expression fidelity and dispersion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A meta-analysis of chromatin-associated loci provides insights into mechanistic interpretations of trait heritability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Finding Significant Hits in Networks: a network-based tool for analyzing gene-level P-values to identify significant genes missed by standard methods.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Functional implications of polygenic risk for schizophrenia in human neurons.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Combining Motifs, CRE Activity, And Gene Expression Data Using ML Greatly Improves the Accuracy of Tissue-Specific TF Network Maps.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Integrative gene and isoform co-expression networks reveal regulatory rewiring in stress-related psychiatric disorders.iScience · 2025Article
- Dynamic convergence of neurodevelopmental disorder risk genes across neurodevelopment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Maternal Overnutrition in Beef Cattle: Effects on Fetal Programming, Metabolic Health, and Postnatal Outcomes.Biology · 2025Review
- Alternative splicing across the C. elegans nervous system.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Variant-to-function approaches for adipose tissue: Insights into cardiometabolic disorders.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- Article
- Neuropilin-1: A Multifaceted Target for Cancer Therapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- AJGM: joint learning of heterogeneous gene networks with adaptive graphical model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Network-based anomaly detection algorithm reveals proteins with major roles in human tissues.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Article
53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene co-expression networks capture biologically important patterns in gene expression data, enabling functional analyses of genes, discovery of biomarkers, and interpretation of genetic variants. Most network analyses to date have been limited to assessing correlation between total gene expression levels in a single tissue or small sets of tissues. Here, we built networks that additionally capture the regulation of relative isoform abundance and splicing, along with tissue-specific connections unique to each of a diverse set of tissues. We used the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project v6 RNA sequencing data across 50 tissues and 449 individuals. First, we developed a framework called Transcriptome-Wide Networks (TWNs) for combining total expression and relative isoform levels into a single sparse network, capturing the interplay between the regulation of splicing and transcription. We built TWNs for 16 tissues and found that hubs in these networks were strongly enriched for splicing and RNA binding genes, demonstrating their utility in unraveling regulation of splicing in the human transcriptome. Next, we used a Bayesian biclustering model that identifies network edges unique to a single tissue to reconstruct Tissue-Specific Networks (TSNs) for 26 distinct tissues and 10 groups of related tissues. Finally, we found genetic variants associated with pairs of adjacent nodes in our networks, supporting the estimated network structures and identifying 20 genetic variants with distant regulatory impact on transcription and splicing. Our networks provide an improved understanding of the complex relationships of the human transcriptome across tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.