Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29020926›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2017

A comparison of the use of propofol alone and propofol with midazolam for pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation - a retrospective cohort study.

RyungA Kang, Young Hee Shin, Nam-Su Gil, Ki Yoon Kim, Hyean Yeo, Ji Seon Jeong

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol for sedation in outpatient endoscopic procedures: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Medical guidelines for Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2019, version 1.1.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  9. Different Doses of Oxycodone for Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy of Esophageal Varices.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

RyungA KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Young Hee ShinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Nam-Su GilDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Ki Yoon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Hyean YeoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Ji Seon JeongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University school of Medicine, 50, Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul, 06351, Korea. jiseon78.jeong@samsung.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5396-1030
Samsung Medical Center · KRKangwon National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric MRI sedation performed by a variety of specialists such as sedationists and anesthesiologists commonly uses propofol, which has similar effects to an ideal sedative agent for maintaining deep sedation. However, when propofol is used, adverse airway events are relatively more common than when using other sedative agents. The concomitant administration of midazolam and propofol can reduce the dose of propofol needed for adequate sedation and might also reduce the frequency of airway obstruction without affecting the patient's recovery profile.

methodsWe reviewed the our hospital records of all pediatric MRI sedation patients aged 3 to 16 years who were sedated with either propofol alone or propofol with midazolam between December 2013 and June 2016.

resultsEight hundred ninety-seven pediatric MRI sedation patients were included (n = 897). The frequency of airway intervention was 25/356 (7.0%) in Group P and 15/541 (2.8%) in Group PM (difference in proportions: 4.2%; 95% CI: 1.4-7.6%; p = 0.002). The mean (SD) time to awake was longer in Group PM compared to Group P [21.2 (5.6) minutes vs. 23.0 (7.1) minutes; mean difference, 1.8 min; 95% CI, 0.9-2.9; p < 0.001]. The mean (SD) time to discharge was longer in Group PM compared to Group P [34.5 (6.9) minutes vs. 38.6 (9.4) minutes; mean difference, 4.0 min; 95% CI, 3.0-5.1; p < 0.001].

conclusionsThe administration of a small dose of midazolam during pediatric MRI sedation using propofol can reduce the frequency of airway complications without prolonging the clinically significant recovery profile.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnesthesia Recovery PeriodChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntraoperative ComplicationsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMidazolamPropofolRetrospective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamPropofolMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MidazolamPediatric sedationPropofol

Identifiers

PMID29020926
PMCPMC5637077
OpenAlexW2761470167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.