ArticleClinical endoscopy2017
Efficacy of Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precut mucosectomy versus endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal lesions sized 10-30 mm: meta-analysis and systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Endoscopic mucosal resection using anchored snare Tip-in versus precut technique for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2024Trial
- Comparison between ligation-assisted and precutting endoscopic mucosal resection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a CHASID study.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Recent updates on the endoscopic treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumor.Intestinal research · 2026Review
- Efficacy, Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Approaches (EMR, ESD and TAMIS) for Early Rectal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Simplified EMR Versus ESD for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors ≤ 10 Mm: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Submucosal saline injection and mini-probe endoscopic ultrasound to assess endoscopic resectability of colorectal subepithelial tumors.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosis, treatment, and current concepts in the endoscopic management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- Endoscopic treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumor: which method is better?Clinical endoscopy · 2022Review
- Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and Oncologic Outcomes in Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors with Lymphovascular Invasion.Gut and liver · 2022Article
- Comparison of conventional and modified endoscopic mucosal resection methods for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Anchoring the snare tip is a feasible endoscopic mucosal resection method for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumor.BMC gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Proper Treatment Option for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Precut Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.Clinical endoscopy · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsEndoscopic resection is the first-line treatment for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) measuring <1 cm and those between 1 and 2 cm in size. However, conventional endoscopic resection cannot achieve complete resection in all cases. We aimed to analyze clinical outcomes of precut endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-P) used for the management of rectal NET.
methodsEMR-P was used to treat rectal NET in 72 patients at a single tertiary center between 2011 and 2015. Both, circumferential precutting and EMR were performed with the same snare device in all patients. Demographics, procedural details, and histopathological features were reviewed for all cases.
resultsMean size of the tumor measured endoscopically was 6.8±2.8 mm.
conclusionsBoth, the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.