Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29020571›Full record

ReviewOrganogenesis2017

Factors and molecules that could impact cell differentiation in the embryo generated by nuclear transfer.

Renata Simões, Arnaldo Rodrigues Santos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Organogenesis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Pigs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Renata Simõesa Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC , SP , Brazil.
Arnaldo Rodrigues Santosa Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC , SP , Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer is a technique to create an embryo using an enucleated oocyte and a donor nucleus. Nucleus of somatic cells must be reprogrammed in order to participate in normal development within an enucleated egg. Reprogramming refers to the erasing and remodeling of cellular epigenetic marks to a lower differentiation state. Somatic nuclei must be reprogrammed by factors in the oocyte cytoplasm to a rather totipotent state since the reconstructed embryo must initiate embryo development from the one cell stage to term. In embryos reconstructed by nuclear transfer, the donor genetic material must respond to the cytoplasmic environment of the cytoplast and recapitulate this normal developmental process. Enucleation is critically important for cloning efficiency because may affect the ultrastructure of the remaining cytoplast, thus resulting in a decline or destruction of its cellular compartments. Nonetheless, the effects of in vitro culturing are yet to be fully understood. In vitro oocyte maturation can affect the abundance of specific transcripts and are likely to deplete the developmental competence. The epigenetic modifications established during cellular differentiation are a major factor determining this low efficiency as they act as epigenetic barriers restricting reprogramming of somatic nuclei. In this review we discuss some factors that could impact cell differentiation in embryo generated by nuclear transfer.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationNuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsBiotechnologyCell NucleusCellular ReprogrammingChromatinCloning, OrganismCytoplasmDNA MethylationEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansChromatinbiotechnologycell differentiationcloningenucleationepigeneticstem cellzygote

Identifiers

PMID29020571
PMCPMC5669214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.