Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29020472›Full record

Trial reportApplied neuropsychology. Adult

Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with cognitive training on cognitive functioning in older adults with HIV: A pilot study.

Pariya L Fazeli, Adam J Woods, Caitlin N Pope, David E Vance, Karlene K Ball

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied neuropsychology. Adult. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Review of cognitive enhancement techniques based on the combination of cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pariya L Fazelia Center for Research on Applied Gerontology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
Adam J Woodsb Center for Cognitive Aging and Memory , McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida , Gainesville , Florida , USA.
Caitlin N Popea Center for Research on Applied Gerontology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
David E Vancea Center for Research on Applied Gerontology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
Karlene K Balla Center for Research on Applied Gerontology , University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Pilot CoreP30AG022838 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI BALL, KARLENE K · 2003 to 2020
$5.7M
A Novel Neurorehabilitation Approach for Cognitive Aging with HIVR00AG048762 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WHEELER, PARIYA FAZELI · 2016 to 2018
$747k
A Novel Neurorehabilitation Approach for Cognitive Aging with HIVK99AG048762 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WHEELER, PARIYA FAZELI · 2014 to 2015
$226k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG048762NIA NIH HHS L30 AG045921NIA NIH HHS P30 AG022838NIA NIH HHS R00 AG048762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine combination speed of processing (SOP) cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) and transcranial direct stimulation (tDCS) as neurorehabilitation in older HIV+ adults. Thirty-three HIV+ adults aged 50+ completed neurocognitive testing and were randomized to either active (n = 17) or sham (n = 16) tDCS. Both conditions received 10 1-hour sessions of SOP CRT, with either active or sham tDCS for the first 20 minutes. Participants then completed a posttest assessment. Repeated measures analysis of variance examining Time X Condition showed small-to-medium effects in the expected direction for an executive (d = 0.36), and SOP measure (d = 0.49), while medium-to-large effects were observed for an executive/attention (d = 0.60) and oral reading measure (d = 0.75). The only statistically significant interaction was the oral reading measure. Small-to-medium and medium-to-large effects (ds = 0.32, 0.58) were found for two SOP measures in the opposite direction (sham group showing greater improvements). Further trials of CRT and tDCS in this population are needed, including larger samples and a nonactive control and tDCS only condition, as is determination of which parameters of each technique (e.g., tDCS montage, timing of tDCS, domain targeted in CRT, number of sessions) are most effective in improving cognitive outcomes, durability of training gains, and translation to everyday functioning.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedAgingCognitive DysfunctionCognitive RemediationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurological RehabilitationPilot ProjectsTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBrain stimulationcognitive remediation therapyHIV/AIDSneuromodulationTDCS

Identifiers

PMID29020472
PMCPMC5661972
OpenAlexW2762801738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.