Trial reportEuropean heart journal2017
Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Single-arm Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of PCI of de Novo 3-vessel Disease Applying the SYNTAX Score II With Pressure Wire Functional Assessment and IVUS Guidance, Using an Everolimus-eluting Stent With Biodegradable Abluminal Coating
Long-Term Outcomes of Different Treatment Strategies in Patients With Three-Vessel Coronary Disease
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 290 citations in OpenAlex.
- Temporal trends in clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review of 66,327 patients from 25 all-comers trials.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- Stent versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multi-Vessel and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials with Subgroups Evaluation.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Pooled it
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Three-year outcomes of A Randomized Multicentre Trial Comparing Revascularization and Optimal Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions (EuroCTO).EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Trial
- Five-year outcomes after state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three-vessel disease: final results of the SYNTAX II study.European heart journal · 2022Trial
- Outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based percutaneous coronary intervention in an all-comers study.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Trial
- Ten-year all-cause death following percutaneous or surgical revascularization in patients with prior cerebrovascular disease: insights from the SYNTAX Extended Survival study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Trial
- Mis-estimation of coronary lesions and rectification by SYNTAX score feedback for coronary revascularization appropriateness.Chinese medical journal · 2020Trial
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical vs. Percutaneous vs. Hybrid Revascularization in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Residual Myocardial Ischemia and Clinical Outcomes at One Year-Hybrid coronary REvascularization Versus Stenting or Surgery (HREVS).Journal of interventional cardiology · 2020Trial
- Association of Sex With Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Diastolic pressure ratio: new approach and validation vs. the instantaneous wave-free ratio.European heart journal · 2019Trial
- Coronary computed tomography angiography for heart team decision-making in multivessel coronary artery disease.European heart journal · 2018Trial
- Prognostic Implication of a CT-FFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Anatomy Meets Evidence: Left Main Bifurcation Stenting in the Era of Network Meta-analysis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Global trends and research hotspots in coronary revascularization for ischemic heart disease: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2024).Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- SYNTAX score affects LIMA graft flow dynamics in coronary artery bypass surgery.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2026Article
- Real-world study to compare functional SYNTAX score versus anatomical SYNTAX score in influencing the treatment strategy for multivessel disease patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Treatment of Complex Coronary Artery Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- When Functional Assessment Meets Intravascular Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
38 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To investigate if recent technical and procedural developments in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly influence outcomes in appropriately selected patients with three-vessel (3VD) coronary artery disease. Methods and results: The SYNTAX II study is a multicenter, all-comers, open-label, single arm study that investigated the impact of a contemporary PCI strategy on clinical outcomes in patients with 3VD in 22 centres from four European countries. The SYNTAX-II strategy includes: heart team decision-making utilizing the SYNTAX Score II (a clinical tool combining anatomical and clinical factors), coronary physiology guided revascularisation, implantation of thin strut bioresorbable-polymer drug-eluting stents, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided stent implantation, contemporary chronic total occlusion revascularisation techniques and guideline-directed medical therapy. The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE [composite of all-cause death, cerebrovascular event, any myocardial infarction and any revascularisation]) at one year was compared to a predefined PCI cohort from the original SYNTAX-I trial selected on the basis of equipoise 4-year mortality between CABG and PCI. As an exploratory endpoint, comparisons were made with the historical CABG cohort of the original SYNTAX-I trial. Overall 708 patients were screened and discussed within the heart team; 454 patients were deemed appropriate to undergo PCI. At one year, the SYNTAX-II strategy was superior to the equipoise-derived SYNTAX-I PCI cohort (MACCE SYNTAX-II 10.6% vs. SYNTAX-I 17.4%; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.85, P = 0.006). This difference was driven by a significant reduction in the incidence of MI (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11-0.70, P = 0.007) and revascularisation (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.9, P = 0.015). Rates of all-cause death (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27-1.73, P = 0.43) and stroke (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.10-4.89, P = 0.71) were similar. The rate of definite stent thrombosis was significantly lower in SYNTAX-II (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07-0.97, P = 0.045). Conclusion: At one year, clinical outcomes with the SYNTAX-II strategy were associated with improved clinical results compared to the PCI performed in comparable patients from the original SYNTAX-I trial. Longer term follow-up is awaited and a randomized clinical trial with contemporary CABG is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02015832.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.