Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29020232›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2017

Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage.

Philippe Généreux, Philippe Pibarot, Björn Redfors, Michael J Mack, Raj R Makkar, Wael A Jaber, Lars G Svensson, Samir Kapadia, E Murat Tuzcu, Vinod H Thourani and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05024942 (Lung Ultrasound in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement), which is not on this map. Cited by 296 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
296citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05024942 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Lung Ultrasound in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: a Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCatholic University of the Sacred HeartRan2021 to 2022Enrolled150ConditionsTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Lung Ultrasound, Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis, Pulmonary CongestionArmsTransfemoral TAVR (Transcatheter aortic valve replacement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

296 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 674 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A meta-analysis of left ventricular dysfunction in ankylosing spondylitis.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

236 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 14 institutions in 3 countries.

Philippe GénéreuxClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Philippe PibarotPulmonary Hypertension and Vascular Biology Research Group, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Björn RedforsClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Michael J MackBaylor Scott & White Health, Plano, TX, USA.
Raj R MakkarInterventional Technologies in the Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Wael A JaberHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lars G SvenssonHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Samir KapadiaHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
E Murat TuzcuHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Vinod H ThouraniEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vasilis BabaliarosEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Howard C HerrmannPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wilson Y SzetoPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David J CohenSaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Brian R LindmanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Thomas McAndrewClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Maria C AluColumbia University Medical Center, 161?Ft. Washington Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Pamela S DouglasDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Rebecca T HahnClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Susheel K KodaliClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Craig R SmithColumbia University Medical Center, 161?Ft. Washington Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10032, USA.
D Craig MillerStanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
John G WebbUniversity of British Columbia/St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Martin B LeonClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation · USCleveland Clinic · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USEmory University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USBaylor Scott & White Health · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USClinical Research Institute · USSaint Luke's Hospital · USStanford University · USSt. Paul's Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CAVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn patients with aortic stenosis (AS), risk stratification for aortic valve replacement (AVR) relies mainly on valve-related factors, symptoms and co-morbidities. We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of a newly-defined staging classification characterizing the extent of extravalvular (extra-aortic valve) cardiac damage among patients with severe AS undergoing AVR. METHODS AND

resultsPatients with severe AS from the PARTNER 2 trials were pooled and classified according to the presence or absence of cardiac damage as detected by echocardiography prior to AVR: no extravalvular cardiac damage (Stage 0), left ventricular damage (Stage 1), left atrial or mitral valve damage (Stage 2), pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage (Stage 3), or right ventricular damage (Stage 4). One-year outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier techniques and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify 1-year predictors of mortality. In 1661 patients with sufficient echocardiographic data to allow staging, 47 (2.8%) patients were classified as Stage 0, 212 (12.8%) as Stage 1, 844 (50.8%) as Stage 2, 413 (24.9%) as Stage 3, and 145 (8.7%) as Stage 4. One-year mortality was 4.4% in Stage 0, 9.2% in Stage 1, 14.4% in Stage 2, 21.3% in Stage 3, and 24.5% in Stage 4 (Ptrend < 0.0001). The extent of cardiac damage was independently associated with increased mortality after AVR (HR 1.46 per each increment in stage, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.67, P < 0.0001).

conclusionThis newly described staging classification objectively characterizes the extent of cardiac damage associated with AS and has important prognostic implications for clinical outcomes after AVR.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiographyFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryHypertrophy, Left VentricularMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Dysfunction, RightAortic stenosisAortic valveAortic valve replacementClassificationStagingTranscatheter aortic valve implantationTranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID29020232
PMCPMC5837727
OpenAlexW2736888189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.