ArticlePloS one2017
A shift from motorised travel to active transport: What are the potential health gains for an Australian city?
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Is the Best Practice Method for Quantifying the Health and Economic Benefits of Active Transport?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Modelling the potential health and economic benefits of reducing population sitting time in Australia.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Trial
- Active Transport Health Model: Valuing the Health Benefits of Active Transport.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- Integrating more walking into public transit commuting: a proof-of-concept study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Understanding and including 'pink-collar' workers in employment-based travel demand models.PloS one · 2024Article
- Physical Activity and Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Australia: A Lifetable Analysis.AJPM focus · 2023Article
- From motorised to active travel: using GPS data to explore potential physical activity gains among adolescents.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Transit Use and Health Care Costs: A Cross-sectional Analysis.Journal of transport & health · 2022Article
- Premature Mortality of 2050 High Bike Use Scenarios in 17 Countries.Environmental health perspectives · 2021Article
- Could smart research ensure healthy people in disrupted cities?Journal of transport & health · 2020Review
- Keeping kids safe for active travel to school: A mixed method examination of school policies and practices and children's school travel behaviour.Travel behaviour & society · 2020Article
- Does linear equating improve prediction in mapping? Crosswalking MacNew onto EQ-5D-5L value sets.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020Article
- Trends in Transportation Modes and Time among Chinese Population from 2002 to 2012.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Understanding the rise of cardiometabolic diseases in low- and middle-income countries.Nature medicine · 2019Review
- Better transport accessibility, better health: a health economic impact assessment study for Melbourne, Australia.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019Article
- Physical activity-related health and economic benefits of building walkable neighbourhoods: a modelled comparison between brownfield and greenfield developments.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2019Article
- Potential of active transport to improve health, reduce healthcare costs, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions: A modelling study.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAn alarmingly high proportion of the Australian adult population does not meet national physical activity guidelines (57%). This is concerning because physical inactivity is a risk factor for several chronic diseases. In recent years, an increasing emphasis has been placed on the potential for transport and urban planning to contribute to increased physical activity via greater uptake of active transport (walking, cycling and public transport). In this study, we aimed to estimate the potential health gains and savings in health care costs of an Australian city achieving its stated travel targets for the use of active transport.
methodsAdditional active transport time was estimated for the hypothetical scenario of Brisbane (1.1 million population 2013) in Australia achieving specified travel targets. A multi-state life table model was used to estimate the number of health-adjusted life years, life-years, changes in the burden of diseases and injuries, and the health care costs associated with changes in physical activity, fine particle (<2.5 μm; PM2.5) exposure, and road trauma attributable to a shift from motorised travel to active transport. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test alternative modelling assumptions.
resultsOver the life course of the Brisbane adult population in 2013 (860,000 persons), 33,000 health-adjusted life years could be gained if the travel targets were achieved by 2026. This was mainly due to lower risks of physical inactivity-related diseases, with life course reductions in prevalence and mortality risk in the range of 1.5%-6.0%. Prevalence and mortality of respiratory diseases increased slightly (≥0.27%) due to increased exposure of larger numbers of cyclists and pedestrians to fine particles. The burden of road trauma increased by 30% for mortality and 7% for years lived with disability. We calculated substantial net savings ($AU183 million, 2013 values) in health care costs.
conclusionIn cities, such as Brisbane, where over 80% of trips are made by private cars, shifts towards walking, cycling and public transport would cause substantial net health benefits and savings in health care costs. However, for such shifts to occur, investments are needed to ensure safe and convenient travel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.