ArticlePediatric research2018
Progress in the management of neonatal sepsis: the importance of a consensus definition.
Article in Pediatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Umbilical cord blood culture in neonatal early-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric research · 2022Pooled it
- Neonatal sepsis: a systematic review of core outcomes from randomised clinical trials.Pediatric research · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence model comparison for risk factor analysis of patent ductus arteriosus in nationwide very low birth weight infants cohort.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Validation of the ICD-10 Diagnoses of Early-Onset Neonatal Infection in the Danish National Patient Register from 2010 to 2018.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- InfEHR: Clinical phenotype resolution through deep geometric learning on electronic health records.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Inflammation in Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review of Human Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Assessment of Culture-Negative Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: Risk Factors and Utility of Currently Used Serum Biomarkers.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models as Early Warning Systems for Neonatal Infection.Clinics in perinatology · 2025Review
- Lipopolysaccharide induced systemic inflammation and heart rate variability in a term newborn piglet model.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and hemocyte parameters in neonates with bloodstream infection: Role of activated hemocyte-related genes.Pediatric discovery · 2024Article
- Understanding the Difficulties in Diagnosing Neonatal Sepsis: Assessing the Role of Sepsis Biomarkers.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2024Article
- Angiogenesis-associated pathways play critical roles in neonatal sepsis outcomes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transforming neonatal care with artificial intelligence: challenges, ethical consideration, and opportunities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
- Insight Into Neonatal Sepsis: An Overview.Cureus · 2023Review
- Artificial and human intelligence for early identification of neonatal sepsis.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- World Health Organization Danger Signs to predict bacterial sepsis in young infants: A pragmatic cohort study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a late-onset sepsis mortality predictor in very low birth weight newborns: a Brazilian cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Neonatal septic shock, a focus on first line interventions.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Review
- Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Pediatric, Neonatal, and Maternal Inpatients: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29019470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.