Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29019396›Full record

ReviewACS chemical biology2018

The Promise and Challenge of In Vivo Delivery for Genome Therapeutics.

Ross C Wilson, Luke A Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Targeted gene delivery systems for T-cell engineering.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ross C WilsonInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0644-5540
Luke A GilbertInnovative Genomics Institute, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5854-0825

Funding

A functional genomics approach to determine the mechanism of cellular response to new anti-cancer R00CA204602 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GILBERT, LUKE · 2017 to 2019
$747k
A functional genomics approach to determine the mechanism of cellular response to new anti-cancer drugsK99CA204602 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GILBERT, LUKE · 2016 to 2016
$139k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA204602NCI NIH HHS R00 CA204602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-based genome editing technologies are poised to enable countless new therapies to prevent, treat, or cure diseases with a genetic basis. However, the safe and effective delivery of genome editing enzymes represents a substantial challenge that must be tackled to enable the next generation of genetic therapies. In this Review, we summarize recent progress in developing enzymatic tools to combat genetic disease and examine current efforts to deliver these enzymes to the cells in need of correction. Viral vectors already in use for traditional gene therapy are being applied to enable in vivo CRISPR-based therapeutics, as are emerging technologies such as nanoparticle-based delivery of CRISPR components and direct delivery of preassembled RNA-protein complexes. Success in these areas will allow CRISPR-based genome editing therapeutics to reach their full potential.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesGenomeHumansNanoparticlesRibonucleoproteinsVirusesCRISPR-Associated ProteinsRibonucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID29019396
PMCPMC5906052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.