Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29019061›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2017

Neuropsychological Measures that Predict Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's type dementia in Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sylvie Belleville, Céline Fouquet, Carol Hudon, Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun, Jordie Croteau, Consortium for the Early Identification of Alzheimer’s disease-Quebec

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Cognitive markers of resilience to dementia in mild Neurocognitive Impairment: a meta- analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The relation between cognitive functioning and activities of daily living in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: a meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Is more always better? Dose effect in a multidomain intervention in older adults at risk of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Demographically adjusted norms for a French-Quebec version of the face-name associative recognition test.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sylvie BellevilleResearch Center of the Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4565 Chemin Queen Mary, Montréal, Québec, H3W 1W5, Canada. sylvie.belleville@umontreal.ca.
Céline FouquetResearch Center of the Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, 4565 Chemin Queen Mary, Montréal, Québec, H3W 1W5, Canada.
Carol HudonUniversité Laval, Pavillon Félix-Antoine-Savard, 2325, rue des Bibliothèques, Local 1546, Québec, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Hervé Tchala Vignon ZomahounHealth and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1L 2E8, Canada.
Jordie CroteauHealth and Social Services Systems, Knowledge Translation and Implementation component of the Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1L 2E8, Canada.
Consortium for the Early Identification of Alzheimer’s disease-Quebec

Funding

Fonds d'Innovation Pfizer-FRQS of the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé 27239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the extent to which cognitive measures can predict progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's type dementia (AD), assess the predictive accuracy of different cognitive domain categories, and determine whether accuracy varies as a function of age and length of follow-up. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed data from longitudinal studies reporting sensitivity and specificity values for neuropsychological tests to identify individuals with MCI who will develop AD. We searched articles in Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science. Methodological quality was assessed using the STARDem and QUADAS standards. Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria (2365 participants) and reported predictive values from 61 neuropsychological tests with a 31-month mean follow-up. Values were pooled to provide combined accuracy for 14 cognitive domains. Many domains showed very good predictive accuracy with high sensitivity and specificity values (≥ 0.7). Verbal memory measures and many language tests yielded very high predictive accuracy. Other domains (e.g., executive functions, visual memory) showed better specificity than sensitivity. Predictive accuracy was highest when combining memory measures with a small set of other domains or when relying on broad cognitive batteries. Cognitive tests are excellent at predicting MCI individuals who will progress to dementia and should be a critical component of any toolkit intended to identify AD at the pre-dementia stage. Some tasks are remarkable as early indicators, whereas others might be used to suggest imminent progression.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitive testsDiagnosisMild cognitive impairmentNeuropsychologyPredictive accuracy

Identifiers

PMID29019061
PMCPMC5754432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.