Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018927›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology2018

Whole body magnetic resonance in indolent lymphomas under watchful waiting: The time is now.

Massimo Galia, Domenico Albano, Corrado Tarella, Caterina Patti, Luca Maria Sconfienza, Antonino Mulè, Pierpaolo Alongi, Massimo Midiri, Roberto Lagalla

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorialReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. MRI and PET/MRI in hematologic malignancies.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Review
  10. Imaging features of adrenal masses.Insights into imaging · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Massimo GaliaDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Domenico AlbanoDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy. albanodomenico@me.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-9861
Corrado TarellaHemato-Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Caterina PattiDepartment of Hematology I, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Viale Trabucco 180, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Luca Maria SconfienzaUnit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milano, Italy.
Antonino MulèDepartment of Hematology I, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Viale Trabucco 180, 90146, Palermo, Italy.
Pierpaolo AlongiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Contrada Pietrapollastra-Pisciotto, 90015, Cefalù, Italy.
Massimo MidiriDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Roberto LagallaDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITOspedale Vincenzo Cervello · ITFondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù · ITRipamonti · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ᅟ: The indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (i-NHLs) are characterised by 'indolent' clinical behaviour with slow growth and prolonged natural history. The watchful waiting (WW) strategy is a frequently employed treatment option in these patients. This implies a strict monitoring by imaging examinations, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) and CT. A major concern is radiation exposure due to regularly monitoring by conventional imaging procedures. Several studies have demonstrated the reliability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for lymphoma staging. WB-MRI could be useful for active surveillance in i-NHLs providing the suspect of disease progression that can be then confirmed by additional diagnostic procedures, including 18F-FDG-PET/CT. The directive 2013/59 by the European Union claims that if a radiation-free imaging technique allows obtaining the same diagnostic results, it should be invariably used. In this setting, WB-MRI may be considered a reasonable option in i-NHLs under WW, replacing imaging modalities that cause exposure to ionising radiations. This will help to reduce the cancer risk in i-NHL patients for whom chemo-/radiotherapy remain the usual treatment options following the usually long WW phase. The scientific community should raise the awareness of the risk of ionising radiations in i-NHLs and the emphasise the need for establishing the proper place of WB-MRI in lymphoma imaging. KEY POINTS: • Watchful waiting is a reasonable option in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. • Imaging is crucial to monitor patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas. • CT and

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDisease ProgressionHumansLymphoma, Non-HodgkinReproducibility of ResultsWatchful WaitingWhole Body ImagingIonising radiationLymphomaMagnetic resonance imagingWatchful waitingWhole body imaging

Identifiers

PMID29018927
OpenAlexW2763398173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.