Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018890›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2017

[Magnetic resonance imaging findings after shoulder surgery: What the radiologist needs to know].

U L Fahlenkamp, C Gerhardt, K-G A Hermann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Postoperative imaging of the shoulder].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

U L FahlenkampInstitut für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité - Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
C GerhardtCentrum für muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Charité - Campus Mitte, Berlin, Deutschland.
K-G A HermannInstitut für Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité - Campus Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. kghermann@gmail.com.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even primary diagnostic evaluation of the shoulder is a challenge for radiologists. Many imaging findings that definitely indicate abnormal findings in the untreated shoulder should be evaluated carefully in postoperative patients. Artifacts caused by implants or metal abrasion pose considerable problems in postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Classic approaches to minimizing artifacts caused by foreign bodies include using turbo spin echo sequences, increasing bandwidth, and reducing voxel size. In recent years, several vendors have developed dedicated pulse sequences for reducing metal artifacts. Different postoperative imaging findings will be encountered, depending on the kind of surgery done. This review article describes typical postoperative MRI findings, focusing on subacromial decompression, reconstruction of the rotator cuff, labrum procedures, and biceps tenodesis.

Indexed as

ArtifactsHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainProstheses and ImplantsShoulder JointShoulder PainArthroscopyImplant failureMagnetic resonance imagingRotator cuff repairShoulder

Identifiers

PMID29018890
OpenAlexW2761878694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.