Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018807›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2017

Michael J Rothrock, Morgan L Davis, Aude Locatelli, Aaron Bodie, Tori G McIntosh, Janet R Donaldson, Steven C Ricke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Veterinary world · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Growth ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Microbial Biofilms in the Food Industry-A Comprehensive Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Correlation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J RothrockUSDA-ARS, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit, Athens, GA, United States.
Morgan L DavisCenter for Food Safety, Food Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Aude LocatelliUSDA-ARS, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit, Athens, GA, United States.
Aaron BodieCenter for Food Safety, Food Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Tori G McIntoshUSDA-ARS, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Egg Safety and Quality Research Unit, Athens, GA, United States.
Janet R DonaldsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Steven C RickeCenter for Food Safety, Food Science Department, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USU.S. National Poultry Research Center · USQuality Research · USUniversity of Southern Mississippi · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne pathogens such as

Indexed as

detectionisolationListerialive productionpoultry

Identifiers

PMID29018807
PMCPMC5615842
OpenAlexW2742984448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.