Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018577›Full record

ArticleESMO open2017

Palliative treatment with radiation-emitting metallic stents in unresectable Bismuth type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Jian Lu, Jin-He Guo, Hai-Dong Zhu, Guang-Yu Zhu, Yong Wang, Qi Zhang, Li Chen, Chao Wang, Tian-Fan Pan, Gao-Jun Teng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Stent with radioactive seeds placement for obstructive hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparison between unilateral and bilateral placement.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Novel brachytherapy drainage tube loaded with doubleWorld journal of clinical cases · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian LuDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Jin-He GuoDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Hai-Dong ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Guang-Yu ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Yong WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Chao WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Tian-Fan PanDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Gao-Jun TengDepartment of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emerging data for stenting in combination with brachytherapy in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma are encouraging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiation-emitting metallic stents (REMS) for unresectable Bismuth type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent percutaneous placement with REMS or uncovered self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for unresectable Bismuth type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma between September 2011 and April 2016 were identified into this retrospective study. Data on patient demographics and overall survival, functional success, stent patency and complications were collected at the authors' hospital.

resultsA total of 59 patients were included: 33 (55.9%) in the REMS group and 26 (44.1%) in the SEMS group. The median overall survival was 338 days in the REMS group and 141 days in the SEMS group (p<0.001). The median stent patency time was 385 days for REMS and 142 days for SEMS (p<0.001). The functional success rate (87.9% vs 84.6%, p=0.722) and incidence of overall complications (27.3% vs 26.9%, p=0.999) did not differ in the two groups.

conclusionsPlacement with REMS is safe and effective in palliation for unresectable Bismuth type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and seems to prolong survival as well as patency of stent in these patients.

Indexed as

brachytherapy.cholangiocarcinomajaundicepalliationstent

Identifiers

PMID29018577
PMCPMC5604711
OpenAlexW2754911066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.