Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018540›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2017

Efficacy of individualised diets in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Ather Ali, Theresa R Weiss, Douglas McKee, Alisa Scherban, Sumiya Khan, Maxine R Fields, Damian Apollo, Wajahat Z Mehal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02186743 (Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Food Sensitivity), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02186743 nacompletednot on this map

Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Food Sensitivity: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Inflammatory Cellular Pathways

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled58ConditionsIrritable Bowel SyndromeArmsPersonalized Dietary Advice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Best management of irritable bowel syndrome.Frontline gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diet and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ather AliSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Theresa R WeissSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Douglas McKeeDepartment of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Alisa ScherbanSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Sumiya KhanSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Maxine R FieldsSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Damian ApolloSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Wajahat Z MehalSchool of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Yale University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are often placed on diets guided by food intolerance assays, although these have not been validated. We assessed the effects of individualised diets in patients with IBS guided by a leucocyte activation test.

methodsThis is a parallel-group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial of 58 adults with IBS seen at an academic health centre in Northeast USA. Peripheral venous blood was analysed using a leucocyte activation test; individual foods were reported to produce positive or negative results. Participants were randomised to a 4-week diet with either individualised guidance to eliminate foods with positive assay results and allow foods with negative assay results (intervention), or with individualised guidance, matched in rigour and complexity, to eliminate foods with negative assay results and allow foods with positive assay results (comparison). The primary outcome was between-group differences in the IBS Global Improvement Scale (GIS). Secondary outcomes included reductions in IBS Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) scores and increases in IBS Adequate Relief (AR) and Quality of Life (QOL) scores. An aptamer-based proteomic analysis was conducted in strong responders.

resultsThe intervention group had significantly greater increases in mean GIS score after 4 weeks (0.86 vs comparison; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.67; p=0.04) and 8 weeks (1.22 vs comparison; 95% CI 0.22 to 2.22; p=0.02). The intervention group also had significantly greater reductions in mean SSS score at 4 weeks (-61.78 vs comparison; 95% CI -4.43 to -119.14; p=0.04) and 8 weeks (-66.42 vs comparison; 95% CI -5.75 to -127.09; p=0.03). There were no significant differences between intervention and comparison groups in mean AR or QOL scores. A reduction in neutrophil elastase concentration was associated with reduced symptoms.

conclusionsElimination diets guided by leucocyte activation tests reduced symptoms. These findings could lead to insights into the pathophysiology of IBS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02186743.

Indexed as

Dietary FactorsIrritable Bowel SyndromeQuality Of Life

Identifiers

PMID29018540
PMCPMC5628288
OpenAlexW2756139021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.