ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017
Strain Identity of the Ectomycorrhizal Fungus
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intraspecific variation in plant-fungal interactions across tidal elevation in a salt marsh.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Environmental dependency of ectomycorrhizal fungi as soil organic matter oxidizers.The New phytologist · 2024Article
- Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny Reveal Five New Species ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Carbon availability affects already large species-specific differences in chemical composition of ectomycorrhizal fungal mycelia in pure culture.Mycorrhiza · 2023Article
- Fungal Fight Club: phylogeny and growth rate predict competitive outcomes among ectomycorrhizal fungi.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2023Article
- Comparative genomics reveals dynamic genome evolution in host specialist ectomycorrhizal fungi.The New phytologist · 2021Article
- Digging Deeper: In Search of the Mechanisms of Carbon and Nitrogen Exchange in Ectomycorrhizal Symbioses.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effects of biodiversity on productivity are more likely to be expressed when there is greater potential for niche complementarity. In soil, chemically complex pools of nutrient resources should provide more opportunities for niche complementarity than chemically simple pools. Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal genotypes can exhibit substantial variation in nutrient acquisition traits and are key components of soil biodiversity. Here, we tested the hypothesis that increasing the chemical complexity and forms of soil nutrients would enhance the effects of intraspecific ECM diversity on host plant and fungal productivity. In pure culture, we found substantial variation in growth of strains of the ECM fungus
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.