Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018186›Full record

ReviewNature communications2017

Microfluidics with fluid walls.

Edmond J Walsh, Alexander Feuerborn, James H R Wheeler, Ann Na Tan, William M Durham, Kevin R Foster, Peter R Cook

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Suspended Tissue Open Microfluidic Patterning (STOMP).Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Suspended Tissue Open Microfluidic Patterning (STOMP).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Open millifluidics based on powder-encased channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interfacial tension driven open droplet microfluidics.Advanced materials interfaces · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Suicidal chemotaxis in bacteria.Nature communications · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Reconfigurable microfluidics.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2022
    Review
  20. Novel, Emerging Chip Models of the Blood-Brain Barrier and Future Directions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edmond J WalshDepartment of Engineering Science, Osney Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, University of Oxford, Osney Mead, Oxford, OX2 0ES, UK. edmond.walsh@eng.ox.ac.uk.
Alexander FeuerbornThe Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK.
James H R WheelerDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
Ann Na TanThe Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK.
William M DurhamDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-6633
Peter R CookThe Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK. peter.cook@path.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6639-188X
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

European Research Council 242670Medical Research Council MC_PC_15029Medical Research Council MR/K010867/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics has great potential, but the complexity of fabricating and operating devices has limited its use. Here we describe a method - Freestyle Fluidics - that overcomes many key limitations. In this method, liquids are confined by fluid (not solid) walls. Aqueous circuits with any 2D shape are printed in seconds on plastic or glass Petri dishes; then, interfacial forces pin liquids to substrates, and overlaying an immiscible liquid prevents evaporation. Confining fluid walls are pliant and resilient; they self-heal when liquids are pipetted through them. We drive flow through a wide range of circuits passively by manipulating surface tension and hydrostatic pressure, and actively using external pumps. Finally, we validate the technology with two challenging applications - triggering an inflammatory response in human cells and chemotaxis in bacterial biofilms. This approach provides a powerful and versatile alternative to traditional microfluidics.The complexity of fabricating and operating microfluidic devices limits their use. Walsh et al. describe a method in which circuits are printed as quickly and simply as writing with a pen, and liquids in them are confined by fluid instead of solid walls.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsSemen AnalysisChemotaxisHumansInfertility, MaleMaleReproductive Techniques, AssistedSpermatozoaSperm Motility

Identifiers

PMID29018186
PMCPMC5635017
OpenAlexW2761124894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.