Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29018121›Full record

ArticlemBio2017

Dysbiosis and Its Discontents.

Katarzyna B Hooks, Maureen A O'Malley

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 196 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
196citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05138484 phase3completednot on this map

Clinical Evaluation of a Mouthwash Containing Malva Sylvestris Extract and Its Role in Reducing Oral Biofilm and Gingival Inflammation. A Randomized, Triple Masked Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAravena, Pedro, DDS, PhDRan2017 to 2019Enrolled54ConditionsPeriodontal DiseasesArmsexperimental group 10% mouthwash of M. sylvestris extract
NCT06095076 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Descriptive Study of the Cutaneous Microbiota of ICU Patients With Central Venous Catheter (ICMc)

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier de CayenneRan2023 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsDysbiosis, Catheter-Related InfectionsArmsSkin swabbing, Data collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

196 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Consequences ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

136 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarzyna B HooksCentre de Bioinformatique de Bordeaux, Centre de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France katarzyna.hooks@u-bordeaux.fr maureen.omalley@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-0687-4393
Maureen A O'MalleyCentre de Bioinformatique de Bordeaux, Centre de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France katarzyna.hooks@u-bordeaux.fr maureen.omalley@u-bordeaux.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysbiosis is a key term in human microbiome research, especially when microbiome patterns are associated with disease states. Although some questions have been raised about how this term is applied, its use continues undiminished in the literature. We investigate the ways in which microbiome researchers discuss dysbiosis and then assess the impact of different concepts of dysbiosis on microbiome research. After an overview of the term's historical roots, we conduct quantitative and qualitative analyses of a large selection of contemporary dysbiosis statements. We categorize both short definitions and longer conceptual statements about dysbiosis. Further analysis allows us to identify the problematic implications of how dysbiosis is used, particularly with regard to causal hypotheses and normal-abnormal distinctions. We suggest that researchers should reflect carefully on the ways in which they discuss dysbiosis, in order for the field to continue to develop greater predictive scope and explanatory depth.

Indexed as

DysbiosisMicrobiotaBiodiversityHomeostasisHumansdysbiosishomeostasismicrobial diversitymicrobiomemicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID29018121
PMCPMC5635691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.