Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017992›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2017

Mobile Apps for Suicide Prevention: Review of Virtual Stores and Literature.

Isabel de la Torre, Gema Castillo, Jon Arambarri, Miguel López-Coronado, Manuel A Franco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Videotherapy and therapeutic alliance in the age of COVID-19.Clinical psychology & psychotherapy · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel de la TorreDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3134-7720
Gema CastilloDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-604X
Jon ArambarriVirtualWare Labs Foundation, Bilbao, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6450-8562
Miguel López-CoronadoDepartment of Signal Theory and Communications, and Telematics Engineering, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1543-9732
Manuel A FrancoPsychiatry Service, Hospital of Zamora, Zamora, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3639-2523
Universidad de Valladolid · ESHospital Virgen de la Concha · ESVirtualware Group (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best manner to prevent suicide is to recognize suicidal signs and signals, and know how to respond to them.

objectiveWe aim to study the existing mobile apps for suicide prevention in the literature and the most commonly used virtual stores.

methodsTwo reviews were carried out. The first was done by searching the most commonly used commercial app stores, which are iTunes and Google Play. The second was a review of mobile health (mHealth) apps in published articles within the last 10 years in the following 7 scientific databases: Science Direct, Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, The Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar.

resultsA total of 124 apps related to suicide were found in the cited virtual stores but only 20 apps were specifically designed for suicide prevention. All apps were free and most were designed for Android. Furthermore, 6 relevant papers were found in the indicated scientific databases; in these studies, some real experiences with physicians, caregivers, and families were described. The importance of these people in suicide prevention was indicated.

conclusionsThe number of apps regarding suicide prevention is small, and there was little information available from literature searches, indicating that technology-based suicide prevention remains understudied. Many of the apps provided no interactive features. It is important to verify the accuracy of the results of different apps that are available on iOS and Android. The confidence generated by these apps can benefit end users, either by improving their health monitoring or simply to verify their body condition.

Indexed as

appliteraturepreventionsuicidevirtual stores

Identifiers

PMID29017992
PMCPMC5654733
OpenAlexW2762700279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.