Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017608›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2017

Autologous mesenchymal stem cells or meniscal cells: what is the best cell source for regenerative meniscus treatment in an early osteoarthritis situation?

Johannes Zellner, Girish Pattappa, Matthias Koch, Siegmund Lang, Johannes Weber, Christian G Pfeifer, Michael B Mueller, Richard Kujat, Michael Nerlich, Peter Angele

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Effects of TGF-β3 on meniscus repair using human amniotic epithelial cells.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. The clinical potential of meniscal progenitor cells.The journal of cartilage & joint preservation · 2024
    Review
  6. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Aging Cartilage Regeneration: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes ZellnerExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany. Johannes.zellner@ukr.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5385-9378
Girish PattappaExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Matthias KochExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Siegmund LangExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Johannes WeberExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian G PfeiferExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael B MuellerExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Richard KujatExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael NerlichExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter AngeleExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz Josef Strauss Allee 11, 93042, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DEOTH Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of meniscus tears within the avascular region represents a significant challenge, particularly in a situation of early osteoarthritis. Cell-based tissue engineering approaches have shown promising results. However, studies have not found a consensus on the appropriate autologous cell source in a clinical situation, specifically in a challenging degenerative environment. The present study sought to evaluate the appropriate cell source for autologous meniscal repair in a demanding setting of early osteoarthritis.

methodsA rabbit model was used to test autologous meniscal repair. Bone marrow and medial menisci were harvested 4 weeks prior to surgery. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and meniscal cells were isolated, expanded, and seeded onto collagen-hyaluronan scaffolds before implantation. A punch defect model was performed on the lateral meniscus and then a cell-seeded scaffold was press-fit into the defect. Following 6 or 12 weeks, gross joint morphology and OARSI grade were assessed, and menisci were harvested for macroscopic, histological, and immunohistochemical evaluation using a validated meniscus scoring system. In conjunction, human meniscal cells isolated from non-repairable bucket handle tears and human MSCs were expanded and, using the pellet culture model, assessed for their meniscus-like potential in a translational setting through collagen type I and II immunostaining, collagen type II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and gene expression analysis.

resultsAfter resections of the medial menisci, all knees showed early osteoarthritic changes (average OARSI grade 3.1). However, successful repair of meniscus punch defects was performed using either meniscal cells or MSCs. Gross joint assessment demonstrated donor site morbidity for meniscal cell treatment. Furthermore, human MSCs had significantly increased collagen type II gene expression and production compared to meniscal cells (p < 0.05).

conclusionsThe regenerative potential of the meniscus by an autologous cell-based tissue engineering approach was shown even in a challenging setting of early osteoarthritis. Autologous MSCs and meniscal cells were found to have improved meniscal healing in an animal model, thus demonstrating their feasibility in a clinical setting. However, donor site morbidity, reduced availability, and reduced chondrogenic differentiation of human meniscal cells from debris of meniscal tears favors autologous MSCs for clinical use for cell-based meniscus regeneration.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsCells, CulturedCollagen Type IIHumansMaleMeniscusMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationOsteoarthritis, KneeRabbitsTissue EngineeringTransplantation, AutologousCollagen Type IIEarly osteoarthritisMeniscal cellsMeniscus regenerationMeniscus treatmentMesenchymal stem cellsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID29017608
PMCPMC5634903
OpenAlexW2763224399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.