Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017539›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Contraceptive knowledge, perceptions, and concerns among men in Uganda.

Nityanjali Thummalachetty, Sanyukta Mathur, Margo Mullinax, Kelsea DeCosta, Neema Nakyanjo, Tom Lutalo, Heena Brahmbhatt, John S Santelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nityanjali ThummalachettyHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 60 Haven Ave., B-2, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sanyukta MathurHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 60 Haven Ave., B-2, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Margo MullinaxHIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Kelsea DeCostaHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 60 Haven Ave., B-2, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Neema NakyanjoRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Tom LutaloRakai Health Sciences Program, Kalisizo, Uganda.
Heena BrahmbhattDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John S SantelliHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, 60 Haven Ave., B-2, New York, NY, 10032, USA. js2637@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

Rakai Adolescent Project (RAP)R01HD061092 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANTELLI, JOHN S. · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
Prevention and Planning LinkagesR01HD072695 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANTELLI, JOHN S. · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061092NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow contraceptive uptake and high unmet need for contraception remain significant issues in Uganda compared to neighboring countries such as Kenya, Ethiopia, and Rwanda. Although prior research on contraceptive uptake has indicated that male partners strongly influence women's decisions around contraceptive use, there is limited in-depth qualitative research on knowledge and concerns regarding modern contraceptive methods among Ugandan men.

methodsUsing in-depth interviews (N = 41), this qualitative study investigated major sources of knowledge about contraception and perceptions of contraceptive side effects among married Ugandan men.

resultsMen primarily reported knowledge of contraceptives based on partner's experience of side effects, partner's knowledge from health providers and mass media campaigns, and partner's knowledge from her peers. Men were less likely to report contraceptive knowledge from health care providers, mass media campaigns, or peers. Men's concerns about various contraceptive methods were broadly associated with failure of the method to work properly, adverse health effects on women, and severe adverse health effects on children. Own or partner's human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status did not impact on contraceptive knowledge.

conclusionsOverall, we found limited accurate knowledge about contraceptive methods among men in Uganda. Moreover, fears about the side effects of modern contraceptive methods appeared to be common among men. Family planning services in Uganda could be significantly strengthened by renewed efforts to focus on men's knowledge, fears, and misconceptions.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorFamily Planning ServicesHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUgandaYoung AdultContraceptive AgentsContraceptive decision-makingContraceptive knowledgeContraceptive side effectsInterpersonalMen

Identifiers

PMID29017539
PMCPMC5633881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.