Trial reportBMC urology2017
Study protocol: patient reported outcomes for bladder management strategies in spinal cord injury.
Trial report in BMC urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02616081 (Patient Reported Outcomes for Bladder Management Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient Reported Outcomes for Bladder Management Strategies in Spinal Cord Injury
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Present research and emerging trends in neurogenic bladder research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis (2015-2025).Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Utilizing Predictive Analytics to Understand Neurogenic Bladder Symptom Score (NBSS) Variations in Adults With Acquired Spinal Cord Injury.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2025Article
- Impact of Bladder Management Strategies on Autonomic Dysreflexia Severity in People With Spinal Cord Injuries.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2025Observational
- Analysis of Urinary Incontinence in the Neurogenic Bladder and Its Relationship with the Satisfaction and Lifestyle of People with SCI.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Study on the prevalence of neurogenic bladder in Brazilians with traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Primary Care in the Spinal Cord Injury Population: Things to Consider in the Ongoing Discussion.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2023Review
- Reasons for Altering Bladder Management and Satisfaction with Current Bladder Management in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Time-Related Changes in Patient Reported Bladder Symptoms and Satisfaction after Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of urology · 2022Observational
- Psychosocial aspects of health-related quality of life and the association with patient-reported bladder symptoms and satisfaction after spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2021Article
- Factors impacting bowel symptoms in a contemporary spinal cord injury cohort: results from the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group Registry.Spinal cord · 2021Article
- Time Burden of Bladder Management in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2020Review
- Spinal cord injury and male infertility-a review of current literature, knowledge gaps, and future research.Translational andrology and urology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of spinal cord injury (SCI) patients have urinary issues, such as incontinence, retention, and frequency. These problems place a significant burden on patients' physical health and quality of life (QoL). There are a wide variety of bladder management strategies available to patients with no clear guidelines on appropriate selection. Inappropriate bladder management can cause hospitalizations and serious complications, such as urosepsis and renal failure. Patients believe that both independence and ability to carry out daily activities are just as important as physical health in selecting the right bladder-management strategy but little is known about patient's QoL with different bladder managements. Our study's aim is to assess patient reported QoL measures with various bladder managements after SCI. This manuscript describes the approach, study design and common data elements for our central study.
methodsThis is a multi-institutional prospective cohort study comparing three different bladder-management strategies (clean intermittent catheterization, indwelling catheters, and surgery). Information collected from participants includes demographics, past medical and surgical history, injury characteristics, current and past bladder management, and SCI /bladder-related complications. Patient reported outcomes and QoL questionnaires were administered at enrollment and every 3 months for 1 year. Aims of this study protocol are: (1) to assess baseline QoL differences between the three different bladder-management strategies; (2) determine QoL impact when those using either form of catheter management undergo a surgery over the 1 year of follow-up among patients eligible for surgery; (3) assess the effects of changes in bladder management and complications on QoL over a 1-year longitudinal follow-up. DISCUSSION: By providing information about patient-reported outcomes associated with different bladder management strategies after SCI, and the impact of bladder management changes and complications on QoL, this study will provide essential information for shared decision-making and guide future investigation.
trial registrationTrial registration number: www.clinicaltrials.gov : Identifier: NCT0261608; U.S. National Library of Medicine, wwwcf.nlm.nih.gov : Identifier: HSRP20153564.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.