Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017472›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Knowledge, attitude and behaviour towards the use of insecticide treated mosquito nets among pregnant women and children in rural Southwestern Uganda.

Ivan M Taremwa, Scholastic Ashaba, Harriet O Adrama, Carlrona Ayebazibwe, Daniel Omoding, Imelda Kemeza, Jane Yatuha, Thadeus Turuho, Noni E MacDonald, Robert Hilliard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivan M TaremwaInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, International Health Sciences University, P.O Box7782, Kampala, Uganda. imugisha@ymail.com.
Scholastic AshabaDepartment of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Harriet O AdramaInfectious Disease Research Collaboration, Tororo, P.O Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
Carlrona AyebazibweDepartment of Information Technology, Uganda Christian University Mukono, P.O BOX 4, Mukono, Uganda.
Daniel OmodingInfectious Disease Research Collaboration, Mbarara, Kampala, Uganda.
Imelda KemezaDepartment of Educational Foundations and Psychology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Jane YatuhaDepartment of Biology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Thadeus TuruhoDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda.
Noni E MacDonaldDalhousie University, MicroResearch International and IWK Health centre, Halifax, Canada.
Robert HilliardHospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Mbarara University of Science and Technology · UGInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration · UGClarke International University · UGDalhousie University · CAUganda Christian University · UGUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of malaria in Uganda remains unacceptably high, especially among children and pregnant women. To prevent malaria related complications, household possession and use of Insecticide Treated mosquito Nets (ITNs) has become a common practice in the country. Despite the availability of ITNs, malaria remains a foremost public health concern in Uganda. We sought to explore knowledge, attitude, and behaviour towards the use of ITNs as a nightly malaria prevention strategy among pregnant women and children under five years of age in Isingiro district, Southwestern Uganda. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a community based, descriptive cross-sectional study, in which households with children under 5 years, and/or pregnant women were enrolled. We used a structured questionnaire to collect data on participants' understanding of the causes, signs and symptoms of malaria; use of ITNs to prevent malaria; attitudes and behaviours towards the use of ITNs. We also conducted key informant interviews (KIIs) to get in-depth understanding of responses from the participants. We analysed quantitative data using STATA version 12.Qualitative findings from the KIIs were transcribed and translated, and manually analysed using thematic content analysis.

resultsOf the 369 households enrolled, 98.4% (N = 363) households had children under five. Most participants (41.2%, N = 152) were in the 21-30 age category (mean age; 32.2 years). 98.1% (N = 362) of the respondents considered ITNs a key malaria prevention strategy. The ITN possession rate was 84.0% (N = 310), of these, 66.1% (N = 205) consistently used them. 39% of the respondents did not have a positive attitude towards ITNs.

conclusionsAlthough 84.0% of the respondents possessed ITNs, many were not consistently using them. To this, there is need to engage all stakeholders (including cultural leaders, community health workers, religious leaders and the government) in the malaria prevention campaigns using ITNs through: a) government's concerted effort to ensure universal access of right fit ITNs, b) end-user directed health education to emphasize positive attributes of ITN use, c) telling the ITN success stories to improve on the usage.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeRural PopulationAdolescentAdultAgedChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansInfantInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMaleMiddle AgedOwnershipAttitudeChildren under fiveIsingiro districtITNs useKnowledgeMalaria preventionPracticesPregnant womenUganda

Identifiers

PMID29017472
PMCPMC5634848
OpenAlexW2762398701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.