ArticleBMC infectious diseases2017
Evaluation of a pulsed xenon ultraviolet disinfection system to decrease bacterial contamination in operating rooms.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of ultraviolet light-emitting technology against coronaviruses: a systematic review.The Journal of hospital infection · 2021Pooled it
- Role of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light in reducing healthcare-associated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Epidemiology and infection · 2020Pooled it
- Environmental cleaning and disinfection in the operating room: a systematic scoping review through a human factors and systems engineering lens.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024Article
- Systematic evaluating and modeling of SARS-CoV-2 UVC disinfection.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Emergence and Transmission of Daptomycin and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Between Patients and Hospital Rooms.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021Article
- The use of a UV-C disinfection robot in the routine cleaning process: a field study in an Academic hospital.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Article
- Ultraviolet disinfection robots to improve hospital cleaning: Real promise or just a gimmick?Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Article
- Potential of pulsed light technology for control of SARS-CoV-2 in hospital environments.Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Shining a light on the pathogenicity of health care providers' mobile phones: Use of a novel ultraviolet-C wave disinfection device.American journal of infection control · 2020Article
- Engineering photonics solutions for COVID-19.APL photonics · 2020Review
- Development of a Pulsed Xenon Ultraviolet Disinfection Device for Real-Time Air Disinfection in Ambulances.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2020Article
- Evaluation of an Ultraviolet C (UVC) Light-Emitting Device for Disinfection of High Touch Surfaces in Hospital Critical Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Pulsed xenon ultraviolet and non-thermal atmospheric plasma treatments are effective for the disinfection of air in hospital blood sampling rooms.Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2019Article
- Environmental disinfection with photocatalyst as an adjunctive measure to control transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective cohort study in a high-incidence setting.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Update on infection control practices in cancer hospitals.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2018Review
- Use of ultraviolet-C in environmental sterilization in hospitals: A systematic review on efficacy and safety.International journal of health sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnvironmental cleanliness is one of the contributing factors for surgical site infections in the operating rooms (ORs). To decrease environmental contamination, pulsed xenon ultraviolet (PX-UV), an easy and safe no-touch disinfection system, is employed in several hospital environments. The positive effect of this technology on environmental decontamination has been observed in patient rooms and ORs during the end-of-day cleaning but so far, no study explored its feasibility between surgical cases in the OR.
methodsIn this study, 5 high-touch surfaces in 30 ORs were sampled after manual cleaning and after PX-UV intervention mimicking between-case cleaning to avoid the disruption of the ORs' normal flow. The efficacy of a 1-min, 2-min, and 8-min cycle were tested by measuring the surfaces' contaminants by quantitative cultures using Tryptic Soy Agar contact plates.
resultsWe showed that combining standard between-case manual cleaning of surfaces with a 2-min cycle of disinfection using a portable xenon pulsed ultraviolet light germicidal device eliminated at least 70% more bacterial load after manual cleaning.
conclusionsThis study showed the proof of efficacy of a 2-min cycle of PX-UV in ORs in eliminating bacterial contaminants. This method will allow a short time for room turnover and a potential reduction of pathogen transmission to patients and possibly surgical site infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.