Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017314›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology and translational medicine2017

Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Practice in Korea.

Yoon Jin Cha, Ju Yeon Pyo, SoonWon Hong, Jae Yeon Seok, Kyung-Ju Kim, Jee-Young Han, Jeong Mo Bae, Hyeong Ju Kwon, Yeejeong Kim, Kyueng-Whan Min and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology and translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yoon Jin ChaDepartment of Pathology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ju Yeon PyoDepartment of Pathology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
SoonWon HongDepartment of Pathology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Yeon SeokDepartment of Pathology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Kyung-Ju KimDepartment of Pathology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Jee-Young HanDepartment of Pathology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
Jeong Mo BaeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hyeong Ju KwonDepartment of Pathology, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Yeejeong KimNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Kyueng-Whan MinDepartment of Pathology, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Soonae OakDepartment of Pathology, Ilsin Christian Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Sunhee ChangDepartment of Pathology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reviewed the current status of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in Korea. Thyroid aspiration biopsy was first introduced in Korea in 1977. Currently, radiologists aspirate the thyroid nodule under the guidance of ultrasonography, and cytologic interpretation is only legally approved when a cytopathologist makes the diagnosis. In 2008, eight thyroid-related societies came together to form the Korean Thyroid Association. The Korean Society for Cytopathology and the endocrine pathology study group of the Korean Society for Pathologists have been updating the cytologic diagnostic guidelines. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology was first introduced in 2009, and has been used by up to 94% of institutions by 2016. The average diagnosis rates are as follows for each category: I (12.4%), II (57.9%), III (10.4%), IV (2.9%), V (3.7%), and VI (12.7%). The malignancy rates in surgical cases are as follows for each category: I (28.7%), II (27.8%), III (50.6%), IV (52.3%), V (90.7%), and VI (100.0%). Liquid-based cytology has been used since 2010, and it was utilized by 68% of institutions in 2016. The categorization of thyroid lesions into "atypia of undetermined significance" or "follicular lesion of undetermined significance" is necessary to draw consensus in our society. Immunocytochemistry for galectin-3 and BRAF is used. Additionally, a molecular test for BRAF in thyroid FNACs is actively used. Core biopsies were performed in only 44% of institutions. Even the institutions that perform core biopsies only perform them for less than 3% of all FNACs. However, only 5% of institutions performed core biopsies up to three times more than FNAC.

Indexed as

BethesdaFine needle aspiration cytologyKoreaThyroid neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29017314
PMCPMC5700884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.