Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29017081›Full record

ArticleSeizure2017

Safety of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children.

Sarah S Welsh, Nan Lin, Alexis A Topjian, Nicholas S Abend

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Seizure, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Novel Therapeutics for Neonatal Seizures.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Antiseizure medications in critical care: an update.Current opinion in critical care · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah S WelshDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Nan LinDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Alexis A TopjianDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, United States.
Nicholas S AbendDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: abend@email.chop.edu.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Non-convulsive seizures in critically ill children:physiology and outcomeK23NS076550 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ABEND, NICHOLAS SCOTT · 2011 to 2015
$877k
Prompt Diagnosis and Treatment of Subclinical Seizures After Cardiac ArrestK23NS075363 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI TOPJIAN, ALEXIS A. · 2012 to 2016
$874k
Electrographic seizure management and neurobehavioral outcomes in critically ill children.K02NS096058 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI ABEND, NICHOLAS SCOTT · 2017 to 2019
$579k
NINDS NIH HHS K02 NS096058NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS075363NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS076550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute seizures are common in critically ill children. These patients would benefit from intravenous anti-seizure medications with few adverse effects. We reviewed the usage and effects of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children with seizures or status epilepticus.

methodsThis retrospective series included consecutive patients who received at least one dose of intravenous lacosamide from April 2011 to February 2016 in the pediatric intensive care unit of a quaternary care children's hospital, including patients with new lacosamide initiation and continuation of outpatient oral lacosamide. Dosing and prescribing practices were reviewed. Adverse effects were defined by predefined criteria, and most were evaluated during the full admission.

resultsWe identified 51 intensive care unit admissions (47 unique patients) with intravenous lacosamide administration. Lacosamide was utilized as a third or fourth-line anti-seizure medication for acute seizures or status epilepticus in the lacosamide-naïve cohort. One patient experienced bradycardia and one patient experienced a rash that were considered potentially related to lacosamide. No other adverse effects were identified, including no evidence of PR interval prolongation.

conclusionsLacosamide was well tolerated in critically ill children. Further study is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of earlier lacosamide use for pediatric status epilepticus and acute seizures.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAdolescentAnticonvulsantsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCritical IllnessElectroencephalographyEpilepsyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInjections, IntravenousLacosamideMaleAcetamidesAnticonvulsantsLacosamideLacosamidePediatricSeizureStatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID29017081
PMCPMC5685892
OpenAlexW2763381865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.