ArticleSeizure2017
Safety of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children.
Article in Seizure, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and tolerability of short-term infusions of intravenous lacosamide in pediatric patients with epilepsy: An open-label, phase 2/3 trial.Epilepsia open · 2023Trial
- Breaking the seizure cycle: Belgian expert consensus on the diagnostics and treatment of acute convulsive seizures in children.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Review
- Retrospective, Multicenter Study of Lacosamide to Treat Neonatal Seizures.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2026Article
- Intravenous lacosamide for acute repetitive seizures and convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill children.Epilepsia open · 2024Article
- Cardiac Dysfunction Associated with Lacosamide in a Premature Infant with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Case Report.AJP reports · 2024Article
- Novel Therapeutics for Neonatal Seizures.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021Review
- Lacosamide-induced sinus node dysfunction followed by severe agranulocytosis.BMC neurology · 2021Article
- Elucidating the Potential Side Effects of Current Anti-Seizure Drugs for Epilepsy.Current neuropharmacology · 2021Review
- Antiseizure medications in critical care: an update.Current opinion in critical care · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAcute seizures are common in critically ill children. These patients would benefit from intravenous anti-seizure medications with few adverse effects. We reviewed the usage and effects of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children with seizures or status epilepticus.
methodsThis retrospective series included consecutive patients who received at least one dose of intravenous lacosamide from April 2011 to February 2016 in the pediatric intensive care unit of a quaternary care children's hospital, including patients with new lacosamide initiation and continuation of outpatient oral lacosamide. Dosing and prescribing practices were reviewed. Adverse effects were defined by predefined criteria, and most were evaluated during the full admission.
resultsWe identified 51 intensive care unit admissions (47 unique patients) with intravenous lacosamide administration. Lacosamide was utilized as a third or fourth-line anti-seizure medication for acute seizures or status epilepticus in the lacosamide-naïve cohort. One patient experienced bradycardia and one patient experienced a rash that were considered potentially related to lacosamide. No other adverse effects were identified, including no evidence of PR interval prolongation.
conclusionsLacosamide was well tolerated in critically ill children. Further study is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of earlier lacosamide use for pediatric status epilepticus and acute seizures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.