Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016969›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

Implementation of a scalable, web-based, automated clinical decision support risk-prediction tool for chronic kidney disease using C-CDA and application programming interfaces.

Lipika Samal, John D D'Amore, David W Bates, Adam Wright

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lipika SamalDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
John D D'AmoreDiameter Health Inc, Newton, MA, USA.
David W BatesDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Adam WrightDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Health Information Technology for Chronic Kidney Disease ManagementK23DK097187 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAMAL, LIPIKA · 2013 to 2017
$920k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK097187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveClinical decision support tools for risk prediction are readily available, but typically require workflow interruptions and manual data entry so are rarely used. Due to new data interoperability standards for electronic health records (EHRs), other options are available. As a clinical case study, we sought to build a scalable, web-based system that would automate calculation of kidney failure risk and display clinical decision support to users in primary care practices. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a single-page application, web server, database, and application programming interface to calculate and display kidney failure risk. Data were extracted from the EHR using the Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture interoperability standard for Continuity of Care Documents (CCDs). EHR users were presented with a noninterruptive alert on the patient's summary screen and a hyperlink to details and recommendations provided through a web application. Clinic schedules and CCDs were retrieved using existing application programming interfaces to the EHR, and we provided a clinical decision support hyperlink to the EHR as a service.

resultsWe debugged a series of terminology and technical issues. The application was validated with data from 255 patients and subsequently deployed to 10 primary care clinics where, over the course of 1 year, 569 533 CCD documents were processed.

conclusionsWe validated the use of interoperable documents and open-source components to develop a low-cost tool for automated clinical decision support. Since Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture-based data extraction extends to any certified EHR, this demonstrates a successful modular approach to clinical decision support.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSoftwareClinical Decision-MakingElectronic Health RecordsHealth Information InteroperabilityHealth Level SevenHumansInternetUser-Computer Interfaceapplication programming interfacechronic diseaseclinical decision supportHL7 consolidated clinical document architectureinteroperability

Identifiers

PMID29016969
PMCPMC6580936
OpenAlexW2737205697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.