Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016943›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2018

Radiologic progression of glioblastoma under therapy-an exploratory analysis of AVAglio.

Martha Nowosielski, Benjamin M Ellingson, Olivier L Chinot, Josep Garcia, Cedric Revil, Alexander Radbruch, Ryo Nishikawa, Warren P Mason, Roger Henriksson, Frank Saran and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. RANO 2.0: Update to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria for High- and Low-Grade Gliomas in Adults.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Martha NowosielskiMedical University Innsbruck, Department of Neurology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Benjamin M EllingsonUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory and Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Olivier L ChinotAix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Service de Neuro-Oncologie, CHU Timone, Marseille, France.
Josep GarciaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Cedric RevilF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander RadbruchUniversity Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ryo NishikawaSaitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Warren P MasonPrincess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roger HenrikssonRegional Cancer Center Stockholm and Umeå University, Stockholm and Umeå, Sweden.
Frank SaranThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.
Philipp KickingerederUniversity Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael PlattenUniversity Medical Center, Neurology, and Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas SandmannGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Lauren E AbreyUniversity Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Timothy F CloughesyUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory and Neuro-Oncology Program, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Martin BendszusUniversity Medical Center, Neuroradiology, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfgang WickUniversity Medical Center, Neurology, and Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center and the German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DERoche (Switzerland) · CHAix-Marseille Université · FRHeidelberg University · DEPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSaitama Medical University · JPUmeå University · SE

Funding

UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this exploratory analysis of AVAglio, a randomized phase III clinical study that investigated the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to radiotherapy/temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, we aim to radiologically characterize glioblastoma on therapy until progression and investigate whether the type of radiologic progression differs between treatment arms and is related to survival and molecular data. Methods: Five progression types (PTs) were categorized using an adapted algorithm according to MRI contrast enhancement behavior in T1- and T2-weighted images in 621 patients (Bev, n = 299; placebo, n = 322). Frequencies of PTs (designated as classic T1, cT1 relapse, T2 diffuse, T2 circumscribed, and primary nonresponder), time to progression (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed within each treatment arm and compared with molecular subtypes and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. Results: PT frequencies differed between the Bev and placebo arms, except for "T2 diffuse" (12.4% and 7.1%, respectively). PTs showed differences in PFS and OS; with "T2 diffuse" being associated with longest survival. Complete disappearance of contrast enhancement during treatment ("cT1 relapse") showed longer survival than only partial contrast enhancement decrease ("classic T1"). "T2 diffuse" was more commonly MGMT hypermethylated. Only weak correlations to molecular subtypes from primary tissue were detected. Conclusions: Progression of glioblastoma under therapy can be characterized radiologically. These radiologic phenotypes are influenced by treatment and develop differently over time with differential outcomes. Complete resolution of contrast enhancement during treatment is a favorable factor for outcome.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyDNA MethylationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID29016943
PMCPMC5909665
OpenAlexW2752647690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.