Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016887›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2018

Phase I/II trial of vorinostat combined with temozolomide and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: results of Alliance N0874/ABTC 02.

Evanthia Galanis, S Keith Anderson, C Ryan Miller, Jann N Sarkaria, Kurt Jaeckle, Jan C Buckner, Keith L Ligon, Karla V Ballman, Dennis F Moore, Michael Nebozhyn and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Evanthia GalanisDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
S Keith AndersonDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
C Ryan MillerPathobiology and Translational Science Graduate Program, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kurt JaeckleDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Minnesota.
Jan C BucknerDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Keith L LigonDepartment of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Karla V BallmanAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dennis F MooreDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, Kansas.
Michael NebozhynGenetics and Pharmacogenomics, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania.
Andrey LobodaData Analysis, Informatics & Analysis Department, Merck Research Laboratories, Boston, Massachusetts.
David SchiffNeuro-Oncology Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Manmeet Singh AhluwaliaTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Eudocia Q LeeCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth R GerstnerDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Glenn J LesserWake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Michael PradosDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Stuart A GrossmanDepartment of Oncology, Medicine & Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jane CerhanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology and ABTC

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Sites ApplicationU10CA180838 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180838NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, has shown radiosensitizing properties in preclinical studies. This open-label, single-arm trial evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; phase I) and efficacy (phase II) of vorinostat combined with standard chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Methods: Patients received oral vorinostat (300 or 400 mg/day) on days 1-5 weekly during temozolomide chemoradiation. Following a 4- to 6-week rest, patients received up to 12 cycles of standard adjuvant temozolomide and vorinostat (400 mg/day) on days 1-7 and 15-21 of each 28-day cycle. Association between vorinostat response signatures and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed based on RNA sequencing of baseline tumor tissue. Results: Phase I and phase II enrolled 15 and 107 patients, respectively. The combination therapy MTD was vorinostat 300 mg/day and temozolomide 75 mg/m2/day. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation, hyperglycemia, fatigue, and wound dehiscence. The primary efficacy endpoint in the phase II cohort, OS rate at 15 months, was 55.1% (median OS 16.1 mo), and consequently, the study did not meet its efficacy objective. Most common treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities in the phase II component were lymphopenia (32.7%), thrombocytopenia (28.0%), and neutropenia (21.5%). RNA expression profiling of baseline tumors (N = 76) demonstrated that vorinostat resistance (sig-79) and sensitivity (sig-139) signatures had a reverse and positive association with OS/PFS, respectively. Conclusions: Vorinostat combined with standard chemoradiation had acceptable tolerability in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Although the primary efficacy endpoint was not met, vorinostat sensitivity and resistance signatures could facilitate patient selection in future trials.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateTemozolomideVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID29016887
PMCPMC5909661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.