Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016886›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2018

A proposed framework of supportive and palliative care for people with high-grade glioma.

Jennifer Philip, Anna Collins, Caroline Brand, Vijaya Sundararajan, Carrie Lethborg, Michelle Gold, Rosalind Lau, Gaye Moore, Michael Murphy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Neuropalliative care in brain cancer.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Coordination of care in the context of primary brain tumors: Australian healthcare professionals' exploration of the unspoken impact and clinical implications.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer PhilipDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Anna CollinsDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Caroline BrandDepartment of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
Vijaya SundararajanDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carrie LethborgSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle GoldPalliative Care Service, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Rosalind LauSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Gaye MooreSt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael MurphyDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
St Vincent's Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUMonash University · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with malignant high-grade glioma (HGG) have significant supportive and palliative care needs, yet few tailored guidelines exist to inform practice. This study sought to develop an HGG framework of supportive and palliative care informed by needs reported by patients, families, and health care professionals (HCPs). Methods: This study integrates a mixed-methods research program involving: (i) exploring experiences through systematic literature review and qualitative study (10 patients, 23 carers, and 36 HCPs); and (ii) an epidemiological cohort study (N = 1821) describing care of cases of HGG in Victoria, Australia using linked hospital datasets. Recommendations based on these studies were developed by a multidisciplinary advisory committee for a framework of supportive and palliative care based on the findings of (i) and (ii). Results: Key principles guiding framework development were that care: (i) aligns with patient/family caregiver needs according to illness transition points; (ii) involves continuous monitoring of patient/family caregiver needs; (iii) be proactive in response to anticipated concerns; (iv) includes routine bereavement support; and (v) involves appropriate partnership with patients/families. Framework components and resulting activities designed to address unmet needs were enacted at illness transition points and included coordination, repeated assessment, staged information provision according to the illness transition, proactive responses and referral systems, and specific regular inquiry of patients' and family caregivers' concerns. Conclusion: This evidence-based, collaborative framework of supportive and palliative care provides an approach for patients with HGG that is responsive, relevant, and sustainable. This conceptual framework requires evaluation in robust clinical trials.

Indexed as

Palliative CareQuality of LifeResearch DesignTerminal CareBrain NeoplasmsCaregiversFollow-Up StudiesGliomaHumansLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasm GradingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29016886
PMCPMC5817948
OpenAlexW2739614812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.