ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018
NLPReViz: an interactive tool for natural language processing on clinical text.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inclusion of Clinicians in the Development and Evaluation of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Systematic Literature Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Pooled it
- HistoriView: Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Review a Patient Using a Scalable Space-Efficient Timeline without Zoom Interactions.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- RAMPVIS: Answering the challenges of building visualisation capabilities for large-scale emergency responses.Epidemics · 2022Article
- Translational NLP: A New Paradigm and General Principles for Natural Language Processing Research.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. North American Chapter. Meeting · 2021Article
- Interactive Exploration of Longitudinal Cancer Patient Histories Extracted From Clinical Text.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Article
- Clinical Text Data in Machine Learning: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Review
- Interactive NLP in Clinical Care: Identifying Incidental Findings in Radiology Reports.Applied clinical informatics · 2019Article
- Extraction of Temporal Information from Clinical Narratives.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2019Article
- Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Effectiveness of Preoperative Antibiotics in Preventing Surgical Site Infection After Common Soft Tissue Procedures of the Hand.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018Article
- NLPReViz: an interactive tool for natural language processing on clinical text.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Usability Evaluation of an Unstructured Clinical Document Query Tool for Researchers.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gap between domain experts and natural language processing expertise is a barrier to extracting understanding from clinical text. We describe a prototype tool for interactive review and revision of natural language processing models of binary concepts extracted from clinical notes. We evaluated our prototype in a user study involving 9 physicians, who used our tool to build and revise models for 2 colonoscopy quality variables. We report changes in performance relative to the quantity of feedback. Using initial training sets as small as 10 documents, expert review led to final F1scores for the "appendiceal-orifice" variable between 0.78 and 0.91 (with improvements ranging from 13.26% to 29.90%). F1for "biopsy" ranged between 0.88 and 0.94 (-1.52% to 11.74% improvements). The average System Usability Scale score was 70.56. Subjective feedback also suggests possible design improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.