SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018
Tissue specificity of in vitro drug sensitivity.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- DNA Repair Genes as Drug Candidates for Early Breast Cancer Onset in Latin America: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Rethinking network analysis in ethnopharmacology: a multi-omics and AI roadmap to overcome conceptual and methodological biases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Beyond animal models: using human pluripotent stem cell-derived stem and progenitor cells to predict cytotoxicity in normal tissues.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2026Article
- Serum Starvation Enhances the Antitumor Activity of Natural Matrices: Insights into Bioactive Molecules from Dromedary Urine Extracts.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Drug sensitivity prediction from cell line-based pharmacogenomics data: guidelines for developing machine learning models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Impact of between-tissue differences on pan-cancer predictions of drug sensitivity.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Anticancer drug synergy prediction in understudied tissues using transfer learning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- TSEA-DB: a trait-tissue association map for human complex traits and diseases.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Tissue-guided LASSO for prediction of clinical drug response using preclinical samples.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Modeling Pathway Dynamics of the Skeletal Muscle Response to Intravenous Methylprednisolone (MPL) Administration in Rats: Dosing and Tissue Effects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Machine learning and feature selection for drug response prediction in precision oncology applications.Biophysical reviews · 2019Review
- Gene isoforms as expression-based biomarkers predictive of drug response in vitro.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Discovering novel pharmacogenomic biomarkers by imputing drug response in cancer patients from large genomics studies.Genome research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to investigate the tissue specificity of drug sensitivities in large-scale pharmacological studies and compare these associations to those found in drug clinical indications. Materials and Methods: We leveraged the curated cell line response data from PharmacoGx and applied an enrichment algorithm on drug sensitivity values' area under the drug dose-response curves (AUCs) with and without adjustment for general level of drug sensitivity. Results: We observed tissue specificity in 63% of tested drugs, with 8% of total interactions deemed significant (false discovery rate <0.05). By restricting the drug-tissue interactions to those with AUC > 0.2, we found that in 52% of interactions, the tissue was predictive of drug sensitivity (concordance index > 0.65). When compared with clinical indications, the observed overlap was weak (Matthew correlation coefficient, MCC = 0.0003, P > .10). Discussion: While drugs exhibit significant tissue specificity in vitro, there is little overlap with clinical indications. This can be attributed to factors such as underlying biological differences between in vitro models and patient tumors, or the inability of tissue-specific drugs to bring additional benefits beyond gold standard treatments during clinical trials. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis of pan-cancer drug screening datasets indicates that most tested drugs exhibit tissue-specific sensitivities in a large panel of cancer cell lines. However, the observed preclinical results do not translate to the clinical setting. Our results suggest that additional research into showing parallels between preclinical and clinical data is required to increase the translational potential of in vitro drug screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.