Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016789›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

A technology-based patient and family engagement consult service for the pediatric hospital setting.

Gretchen P Jackson, Jamie R Robinson, Ebone Ingram, Mary Masterman, Catherine Ivory, Diane Holloway, Shilo Anders, Robert M Cronin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Informatics opportunities to involve patients in hospital safety: a conceptual model.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Parental Perceptions of Displayed Patient Data in a PICU: An Example of Unintentional Empowerment.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gretchen P JacksonDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN, USA.
Jamie R RobinsonDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN, USA.
Ebone IngramDepartment of Psychiatry, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mary MastermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Catherine IvoryDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA.
Diane HollowayPediatric Critical Care Unit, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA.
Shilo AndersDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert M CroninDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, VUMC, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Vanderbilt Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007450 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica S. Ancker, Bradley A. Malin · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Vanderbilt Children's Hospital launched an innovative Technology-Based Patient and Family Engagement Consult Service in 2014. This paper describes our initial experience with this service, characterizes health-related needs of families of hospitalized children, and details the technologies recommended to promote engagement and meet needs. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consult service documentation for patient characteristics, health-related needs, and consultation team recommendations. Needs were categorized using a consumer health needs taxonomy. Recommendations were classified by technology type. Results: Twenty-two consultations were conducted with families of patients ranging in age from newborn to 15 years, most with new diagnoses or chronic illnesses. The consultation team identified 99 health-related needs (4.5 per consultation) and made 166 recommendations (7.5 per consultation, 1.7 per need). Need categories included 38 informational needs, 26 medical needs, 23 logistical needs, and 12 social needs. The most common recommendations were websites (50, 30%) and mobile applications (30, 18%). The most frequent recommendations by need category were websites for informational needs (39, 50%), mobile applications for medical needs (15, 40%), patient portals for logistical needs (12, 44%), and disease-specific support groups for social needs (19, 56%). Discussion: Families of hospitalized pediatric patients have a variety of health-related needs, many of which could be addressed by technology recommendations from an engagement consult service. Conclusion: This service is the first of its kind, offering a potentially generalizable and scalable approach to assessing health-related needs, meeting them with technologies, and promoting patient and family engagement in the inpatient setting.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationFamilyHospitals, PediatricInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetMobile ApplicationsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolConsumer Health InformaticsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInformation TechnologyMaleconsumer health informaticshealth information technologyinformation needspatient activationpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID29016789
PMCPMC6080811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.