Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016784›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2018

Sex differences in outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: combined registry data from eleven European countries.

Christian Sticherling, Barbora Arendacka, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Sofieke Wijers, Tim Friede, Jochem Stockinger, Michael Dommasch, Bela Merkely, Rik Willems, Andrzej Lubinski and 19 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Sex-specific trends in ventricular arrhythmias among European implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Sudden Death in Men Versus Women with Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Do we need sex-specific guidelines?International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Christian SticherlingDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Barbora ArendackaUniversity Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Robert-Koch-Str.40, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Jesper Hastrup SvendsenRigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, RHC, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen OE 2100, Denmark.
Sofieke WijersUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Tim FriedeUniversity Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Robert-Koch-Str.40, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Jochem StockingerUniversitäts Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Klinik für Kardiologie, Südring 15, 79185 Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Michael DommaschMedizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany.
Bela MerkelySemmelweiss University Heart Center, Varosmajor 68, Budapest 1122, Hungary.
Rik WillemsUniversity of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Andrzej LubinskiMedical University Lodz, Zeromskiego 113, Lodz 90549, Poland.
Michael ScharfeDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Frieder BraunschweigKarolinska Institutet, Department of Cardiology, Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Solnavägen1, Stockholm 17176, Sweden.
Martin SvetlosakSlovak Medical University Limbova 12, Bratislava 83303, Slovakia.
Christine S ZürnEberhards Karls Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller- Str. 10, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Heikki HuikuriUniversity of Oulu, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kajaanintie 50, PO Box 5000, Oulu 90014, Finland.
Panagiota FlevariAttikon University Hospital, Rimini 1, Athens 12462, Greece.
Caspar Lund-AndersenRigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, RHC, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen OE 2100, Denmark.
Beat A SchaerDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Anton E TuinenburgUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Leonard BergauUniversity Medical Center, Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Robert-Koch-Str.40, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Georg SchmidtMedizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany.
Gabor SzeplakiSemmelweiss University Heart Center, Varosmajor 68, Budapest 1122, Hungary.
Bert VandenberkUniversity of Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Emilia KowalczykMedical University Lodz, Zeromskiego 113, Lodz 90549, Poland.
Christian EickEberhards Karls Universität Tübingen, Otfried-Müller- Str. 10, 72070 Tübingen, Germany.
Juhani JuntillaUniversity of Oulu, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kajaanintie 50, PO Box 5000, Oulu 90014, Finland.
David ConenDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Markus ZabelUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
EU-CERT-ICD Investigators
University Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Göttingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEKU Leuven · BEMedical University of Lodz · PLSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Oulu · FIUniversity of Tübingen · DEKarolinska Institutet · SERigshospitalet · DKSlovak Medical University · SKUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEUniversity General Hospital Attikon · GRUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is established for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high risk patients. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy by analysing registry data from 14 centres in 11 European countries compiled between 2002 and 2014, with emphasis on outcomes in women who have been underrepresented in all trials. Methods and results: Retrospective data of 14 local registries of primary prevention ICD implantations between 2002 and 2014 were compiled in a central database. Predefined primary outcome measures were overall mortality and first appropriate and first inappropriate shocks. A multivariable model enforcing a common hazard ratio for sex category across the centres, but allowing for centre-specific baseline hazards and centre specific effects of other covariates, was adjusted for age, the presence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy or a CRT-D, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25%. Of the 5033 patients, 957 (19%) were women. During a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 16-55 months) 129 women (13%) and 807 men (20%) died (HR 0.65; 95% CI: [0.53, 0.79], P-value < 0.0001). An appropriate ICD shock occurred in 66 women (8%) and 514 men (14%; HR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79; P = 0.0002). Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis of 14 local registries in 11 European countries demonstrates that fewer women than men undergo ICD implantation for primary prevention. After multivariate adjustment, women have a significantly lower mortality and receive fewer appropriate ICD shocks.

Indexed as

Electric CountershockSex FactorsAgedArrhythmias, CardiacDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableEquipment FailureEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityPrimary PreventionRegistriesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29016784
PMCPMC5982785
OpenAlexW2731248388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.