Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016714›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular research2017

Low-energy defibrillation with nanosecond electric shocks.

Frency Varghese, Johanna U Neuber, Fei Xie, Jonathan M Philpott, Andrei G Pakhomov, Christian W Zemlin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Atrial fibrillation and flutter conversion with pulsed electric field delivery: preclinical proof of concept.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Recent advances in external cardiac defibrillation techniques].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Excitation and electroporation by MHz bursts of nanosecond stimuli.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2019
    Article
  15. Excitation of murine cardiac myocytes by nanosecond pulsed electric field.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frency VargheseDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Johanna U NeuberDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Fei XieDepartment of Engineering, Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Mount Vernon, OH, USA.
Jonathan M PhilpottDepartment of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Andrei G PakhomovCenter for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, 4211 Monarch Way, Norfolk, VA 23508, USA.
Christian W ZemlinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Old Dominion University · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USMount Vernon Nazarene University · US

Funding

Low Energy Defibrillation with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric FieldR01HL128381 · NHLBI · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI PAKHOMOV, ANDREI G · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL128381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsReliable defibrillation with reduced energy deposition has long been the focus of defibrillation research. We studied the efficacy of single shocks of 300 ns duration in defibrillating rabbit hearts as well as the tissue damage they may cause. METHODS AND

resultsNew Zealand white rabbit hearts were Langendorff-perfused and two planar electrodes were placed on either side of the heart. Shocks of 300 ns duration and 0.3-3 kV amplitude were generated with a transmission line generator. Single nanosecond shocks consistently induced waves of electrical activation, with a stimulation threshold of 0.9 kV (over 3 cm) and consistent activation for shock amplitudes of 1.2 kV or higher (9/9 successful attempts). We induced fibrillation (35 episodes in 12 hearts) and found that single shock nanosecond-defibrillation could consistently be achieved, with a defibrillation threshold of 2.3-2.4 kV (over 3 cm), and consistent success at 3 kV (11/11 successful attempts). Shocks uniformly depolarized the tissue, and the threshold energy needed for nanosecond defibrillation was almost an order of magnitude lower than the energy needed for defibrillation with a monophasic 10 ms shock delivered with the same electrode configuration. For the parameters studied here, nanosecond defibrillation caused no baseline shift of the transmembrane potential (that could be indicative of electroporative damage), no changes in action potential duration, and only a brief change of diastolic interval, for one beat after the shock was delivered. Histological staining with tetrazolium chloride and propidium iodide showed that effective defibrillation was not associated with tissue death or with detectable electroporation anywhere in the heart (six hearts).

conclusionNanosecond-defibrillation is a promising technology that may allow clinical defibrillation with profoundly reduced energies.

Indexed as

Electric CountershockAction PotentialsAnimalsEnergy MetabolismFemaleHeartMaleRabbitsTime FactorsVentricular FibrillationDefibrillationLow-energyMillisecond shocksNanosecond shocksStimulation

Identifiers

PMID29016714
PMCPMC5852636
OpenAlexW2752771410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.