Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016684›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampin resistance in a low-incidence, high-resource setting.

Jason P Rice, Marva Seifert, Kathleen S Moser, Timothy C Rodwell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Value of ultrasound guided biopsy combined with XpertWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Detection ofIJID regions · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease identified during community-based screening forMalawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jason P RiceDivision of Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Marva SeifertDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7554-6396
Kathleen S MoserTuberculosis Control and Refugee Health Program, County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Timothy C RodwellDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.
University of California System · USHealth and Human Services Agency · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Training in the Next Generation in Respiratory ScienceT32HL134632 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MALHOTRA, ATUL, POWELL, FRANK L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Training in Respiratory Biology: Innovate, Integrate, and TranslateT32HL098062 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI POWELL, FRANK L. · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098062NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL134632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, designed to simultaneously detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and rifampin (RIF) resistance, has been well documented in low-resource settings with high TB-incidence. However, few studies have assessed its accuracy in low TB incidence settings. We evaluated the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF using clinical sputum specimens routinely collected from suspect pulmonary TB patients over a 4-year time period in San Diego County, California. Xpert MTB/RIF results were compared to acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy, mycobacterial culture, and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST). Of 751 sputum specimens, 134 (17.8%) were MTBC culture-positive and 2 (1.5%) were multidrug-resistant (MDR). For the detection of MTBC, Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity was 89.6% (97.7% and 74.5% in smear-positive and -negative sputa, respectively) and specificity was 97.2%; while AFB smear sensitivity and specificity were 64.9% and 77.8%, respectively. Xpert MTB/RIF detected 35 of 47 smear-negative culture-positive specimens, and excluded 124 of 137 smear-positive culture-negative specimens. Xpert MTB/RIF also correctly excluded 99.2% (121/122) of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) specimens, including all 33 NTM false-positives by smear microscopy. For the detection of RIF resistance, Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 98.3%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that Xpert MTB/RIF is able to accurately detect MTBC and RIF resistance in routinely collected respiratory specimens in a low TB-incidence setting, with comparable performance to that achieved in high-incidence settings; and suggest that under these conditions the assay has particular utility in detecting smear-negative TB cases, excluding smear-positive patients without MTBC disease, and differentiating MTBC from NTM.

Indexed as

Biological AssayCaliforniaDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisRifampinSputumTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantTuberculosis, PulmonaryRifampin

Identifiers

PMID29016684
PMCPMC5633176
OpenAlexW2761455078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.