Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016634›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Conventional early infant diagnosis in Lesotho from specimen collection to results usage to manage patients: Where are the bottlenecks?

Appolinaire Tiam, Michelle M Gill, Heather J Hoffman, Anthony Isavwa, Mafusi Mokone, Matokelo Foso, Jeffrey T Safrit, Lynne M Mofenson, Thorkild Tylleskär, Laura Guay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Appolinaire TiamCentre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8045-7590
Michelle M GillResearch, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington DC, United States of America.
Heather J HoffmanMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington DC, United States of America.
Anthony IsavwaMedical and Scientific Affairs, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Maseru, Lesotho.
Mafusi MokoneMedical and Scientific Affairs, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Maseru, Lesotho.
Matokelo FosoMedical and Scientific Affairs, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Maseru, Lesotho.
Jeffrey T SafritResearch Alliances, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, New York, New York, United States of America.
Lynne M MofensonResearch, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington DC, United States of America.
Thorkild TylleskärCentre for International Health, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Laura GuayResearch, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington DC, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly infant diagnosis is an important step in identifying children infected with HIV during the perinatal period or in utero. Multiple factors contribute to delayed antiretroviral treatment initiation for HIV-infected children, including delays in the early infant HIV diagnosis cascade.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study to evaluate early infant diagnosis turnaround times in Lesotho. Trained staff reviewed records of HIV-exposed infants (aged-6-8 weeks) who received an HIV test during 2011. Study sites were drawn from Highlands, Foothills and Lowlands regions of Lesotho. Central laboratory database data were linked to facility and laboratory register information. Turnaround time geometric means (with 95% CI) were calculated and compared by region using linear mixed models.

results1,187 individual infant records from 25 facilities were reviewed. Overall, early infant diagnosis turnaround time was 61.7 days (95%CI: 55.3-68.7). Mean time from specimen collection to district laboratory was 14 days (95%CI: 12.1-16.1); from district to central laboratory, 2 days (95%CI 0.8-5.2); results from central laboratory to district hospital, 23.3 days (95%CI: 18.7-29.0); from district hospital to health facility, 3.2 days (95%CI 1.9-5.5); and from health facility to caregiver, 10.4 days (95%CI, 7.9-13.5). Mean times from specimen transfer to the central laboratory and for result transfer from central laboratory to district hospital were significantly shorter in the Lowlands Region (0.9 and 16.2 days, respectively), compared to Highlands Region (6.0 [P = 0.030] and 34.3 days [P = 0.0099]. Turnaround time from blood draw to receipt of results was significantly shorter for HIV infected infants compared to HIV uninfected infants [p = 0.0036] at an average of 47.1 days (95%CI: 38.9-56.9) and 62 days (95%CI: 55.9-68.7) respectively. Of 47 HIV-infected infants, 36 were initiated on antiretroviral therapy at an average of 1.3 days (95%CI: 0.3, 5.7) after caregiver received the result.

conclusionHIV-infected infants received results earlier and were rapidly initiated on antiretroviral therapy once the result was delivered to caregiver. However, average early infant diagnosis turnaround time was two months; the longest period of delay was transfer of results from central laboratory to district hospital. Turnaround time of results based on geographical regions or between hospitals and health centres varied but did not reach statistical significance.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansInfantLesothoPregnancySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID29016634
PMCPMC5634554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.