Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016605›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: Implementation of cut-off values for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-test for feasible screening.

Susanne Angermann, Marcus Baumann, Dominik Steubl, Georg Lorenz, Christine Hauser, Yana Suttmann, Anna-Lena Reichelt, Robin Satanovskij, Franziska Sonntag, Uwe Heemann and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive impairment and microvascular function in end-stage renal disease.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Geriatric assessment in elderly hemodialysis patients.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne AngermannDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9711-6370
Marcus BaumannDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum Ansbach, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany.
Dominik SteublDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Georg LorenzDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Christine HauserDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Yana SuttmannDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Anna-Lena ReicheltDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Robin SatanovskijDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Franziska SonntagDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Uwe HeemannDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Timo GrimmerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Christoph SchmadererDepartment of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReliable identification of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is of utmost importance, as it is associated with poor outcomes including dialysis withdrawal and death. High prevalence of cognitive impairment has been demonstrated in several studies using brief screening instruments or neuropsychological test batteries. However, the relevance of cognitive impairment as well as the accuracy of screening procedures have never been studied in this patient population.

methods151 chronic hemodialysis patients (mean age 65.78 ± 14.88 years, 73,5% male) underwent cognitive testing under standardized conditions by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and, in a second step, the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), an international standard to measure the severity of dementia. For calculating MoCA cut-off values on the basis of the CDR global score, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and c-statistic were applied.

results49.0% of patients were categorized as 0.5 in the CDR global with memory being the predominantly affected domain (47.7% of patients scored ≥ 0.5). Youden's Index led to a threshold of 23.5 points for the MoCA test for optimal differentiation between cognitively normal (CDR global < 0.5) and impaired patients (CDR global ≥ 0.5) based on a sensitivity of approximately 99% and a specificity of approximately 74%.

conclusionInterference of cognitive impairment with patients' independence and daily life was shown using the CDR for the first time in hemodialysis patients. A MoCA score of 23.5 points turned out as optimal threshold to differentiate between patients with and without functional impairment in the CDR, thereby paving the way for implementation of the MoCA test as a quick and thus highly feasible screening instrument for periodic testing in clinical routine.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCognitive DysfunctionDementiaHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedNeuroimagingRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID29016605
PMCPMC5634551
OpenAlexW2761555222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.