ArticlePloS one2017
Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: Implementation of cut-off values for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)-test for feasible screening.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Exploring the Cognitive Profiles of Haemodialysis Patients using Objective and Subjective Indicators: A Cross-sectional Observational Study.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2025Observational
- Normative Data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in Mexican Adults: A Regression-Based Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Diagnostic Performance of Screening Instruments for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- The role of serum biomarkers in the decline of cognitive function in hemodialysis patients: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Screening for cognitive symptoms in dialysis patients with an extended version of Kidney Disease Quality of Life Cognitive Function subscale (KDQOL-CF): a validation study.BMC nephrology · 2024Article
- Intrinsic prefrontal functional connectivity according to cognitive impairment in patients with end-stage renal disease.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Prevalence and severity of cognitive dysfunction in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): clinical and cognitive impact at 1 year.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2022Article
- Cognitive impairment and microvascular function in end-stage renal disease.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2022Article
- Correlation between home systolic blood pressure variability and cognitive impairment in maintenance hemodialysis patients.Seminars in dialysis · 2022Article
- Cognitive Dysfunction and Its Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
- Implementation of a frailty screening programme and Geriatric Assessment Service in a nephrology centre: a quality improvement project.Journal of nephrology · 2021Article
- Geriatric assessment in elderly hemodialysis patients.Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveReliable identification of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is of utmost importance, as it is associated with poor outcomes including dialysis withdrawal and death. High prevalence of cognitive impairment has been demonstrated in several studies using brief screening instruments or neuropsychological test batteries. However, the relevance of cognitive impairment as well as the accuracy of screening procedures have never been studied in this patient population.
methods151 chronic hemodialysis patients (mean age 65.78 ± 14.88 years, 73,5% male) underwent cognitive testing under standardized conditions by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and, in a second step, the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR), an international standard to measure the severity of dementia. For calculating MoCA cut-off values on the basis of the CDR global score, receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis and c-statistic were applied.
results49.0% of patients were categorized as 0.5 in the CDR global with memory being the predominantly affected domain (47.7% of patients scored ≥ 0.5). Youden's Index led to a threshold of 23.5 points for the MoCA test for optimal differentiation between cognitively normal (CDR global < 0.5) and impaired patients (CDR global ≥ 0.5) based on a sensitivity of approximately 99% and a specificity of approximately 74%.
conclusionInterference of cognitive impairment with patients' independence and daily life was shown using the CDR for the first time in hemodialysis patients. A MoCA score of 23.5 points turned out as optimal threshold to differentiate between patients with and without functional impairment in the CDR, thereby paving the way for implementation of the MoCA test as a quick and thus highly feasible screening instrument for periodic testing in clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.