Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2017
Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM): Rationale for Study Design.
Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01239082 (CSP #577 - Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
CSP #577 - Colonoscopy vs. Fecal Immunochemical Testing in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Race, ethnicity, and prior colorectal screening test use in CONFIRM colonoscopy vs fecal immunochemical testing trial participants.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Trial
- Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing versus usual care in diagnostic colorectal cancer screening: the SCREESCO randomized controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Akita Japan population-based colonoscopy screening trial: report of initial colonoscopy.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Interpreting the results from the first randomised controlled trial of colonoscopy: does it save lives?BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2023Trial
- Baseline Features and Reasons for Nonparticipation in the Colonoscopy Versus Fecal Immunochemical Test in Reducing Mortality From Colorectal Cancer (CONFIRM) Study, a Colorectal Cancer Screening Trial.JAMA network open · 2023Trial
- Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test.Gastroenterology · 2023Trial
- Efficacy of screening using annual fecal immunochemical test alone versus combined with one-time colonoscopy in reducing colorectal cancer mortality: the Akita Japan population-based colonoscopy screening trial (Akita pop-colon trial).International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Trial
- Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- [What is confirmed in colorectal cancer screening?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- The potential of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Legal-involved veterans are less likely to receive guideline-concordant colorectal cancer screening.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- Optimal Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Navigating the evolving landscape of colorectal cancer screening with a practical framework: a comprehensive analysis of existing and emerging technologies for informed decision-making.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Stool and blood biomarkers for colorectal cancer management: an update on screening and disease monitoring.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Screening for liver fibrosis: lessons from colorectal and lung cancer screening.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleColorectal cancer (CRC) is preventable through screening, with colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing comprising the two most commonly used screening tests. Given the differences in complexity, risk, and cost, it is important to understand these tests' comparative effectiveness. STUDY
designThe CONFIRM Study is a large, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, parallel group trial to compare screening with colonoscopy vs. the annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in 50,000 average risk individuals. CONFIRM examines whether screening colonoscopy will be superior to a FIT-based screening program in the prevention of CRC mortality measured over 10 years. Eligible individuals 50-75 years of age and due for CRC screening are recruited from 46 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers. Participants are randomized to either colonoscopy or annual FIT. Results of colonoscopy are managed as per usual care and study participants are assessed for complications. Participants testing FIT positive are referred for colonoscopy. Participants are surveyed annually to determine if they have undergone colonoscopy or been diagnosed with CRC. The primary endpoint is CRC mortality. The secondary endpoints are (1) CRC incidence (2) complications of screening colonoscopy, and (3) the association between colonoscopists' characteristics and neoplasia detection, complications and post-colonoscopy CRC. CONFIRM leverages several key characteristics of the VA's integrated healthcare system, including a shared medical record with national databases, electronic CRC screening reminders, and a robust national research infrastructure with experience in conducting large-scale clinical trials. When completed, CONFIRM will be the largest intervention trial conducted within the VA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01239082).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.