Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29016496›Full record

SynthesisObstetrics and gynecology2017

Leiomyomas in Pregnancy and Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Alexandra C Sundermann, Digna R Velez Edwards, Michael J Bray, Sarah H Jones, Sanura M Latham, Katherine E Hartmann

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effects on heavy menstrual bleeding and pregnancy of uterine artery embolization (UAE) or myomectomy for women with uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy: The FEMME randomized controlled trial.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Fibroids and pregnancy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Endocrinological cause behind recurrent miscarriages: primary hyperparathyroidism.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Uterine Fibroids and Pregnancy: How Do They Affect Each Other?Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. THE AUTHORS REPLY.American journal of epidemiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra C SundermannVanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute of Medicine and Public Health, the Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, the Evidence-Based Practice Center, and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Digna R Velez Edwards
Michael J Bray
Sarah H Jones
Sanura M Latham
Katherine E Hartmann
Vanderbilt Health · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Training Program on Genetic Variation and Human PhenotypesT32GM080178 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI COX, NANCY J, SAMUELS, DAVID C · 2007 to 2021
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review studies reporting the risk of spontaneous abortion among pregnant women of typical reproductive potential with and without uterine leiomyomas. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for publications from January 1970 to December 2016. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We excluded studies that did not use imaging to uniformly document leiomyoma status of all participants, did not have a comparison group without leiomyomas, or primarily included women seeking care for recurrent miscarriage, infertility care, or assisted reproductive technologies. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

resultsTwo authors independently reviewed eligibility, extracted data, and assigned overall quality ratings based on predetermined criteria. Of 1,469 articles identified, nine were eligible. Five enrolled general obstetric populations and four included women undergoing amniocentesis. In five studies in general obstetric populations that included 21,829 pregnancies (1,394 women with leiomyomas and 20,435 without), only one adjusted for potential confounders. This meta-analysis revealed no increase in risk of spontaneous abortion among those with leiomyomas compared with those without (11.5% compared with 8.0%; risk ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.80-1.52). When bias from confounding was estimated for nonadjusted studies, the aggregate calculated risk ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.68-0.98).

conclusionLeiomyoma presence was not associated with increased risk of spontaneous abortion in an analysis of more than 20,000 pregnant women. Failure of prior studies to adjust for confounders may have led to the common clinical belief that leiomyomas are a risk factor for spontaneous abortion.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAbortion, SpontaneousAdultFemaleHumansLeiomyomaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticRisk FactorsUterine Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29016496
PMCPMC5656535
OpenAlexW2762801440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.