Observational studyAmerican journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation2018
Feasibility and Reliability of Functional Muscle Tests in Lung Transplant Recipients.
Observational study in American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computed Tomography-Based Body Composition is Related to Perioperative Morbidity in Older Lung Transplant Recipients.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2025Article
- Postoperative conditions of rehabilitative interest in lung transplantation: a systematic review.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2024Article
- Reproducibility of the 6-minute walk test in lung transplant recipients.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2023Article
- Age-specific differences in the time-frequency representation of surface electromyographic data recorded during a submaximal cyclic back extension exercise: a promising biomarker to detect early signs of sarcopenia.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Myostatin and other musculoskeletal markers in lung transplant recipients.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2019Article
- Considerations and Practical Options for Measuring Muscle Strength: A Narrative Review.BioMed research international · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study investigates the feasibility, reliability, and correlations of recommended functional tests in lung transplant recipients shortly after surgery.
designThis is an observational study.
methodsFifty patients (28 females) performed well-standardized maximum isometric back extension in a sitting position, handgrip strength, and Biering-Sørensen endurance tests shortly before discharge from the acute hospital, shortly thereafter, and 2 mos later after subacute rehabilitation.
resultsBack extension testing was well feasible, but only two thirds of the patients could perform the Biering-Sørensen test at baseline and they experienced a greater number of minor but no major adverse events. Absolute reliability measures and the intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent for the strength (0.97-0.98 [0.95-0.99]) and good for the endurance tests (0.69 [0.26-0.87]). Handgrip revealed high correlation with back strength (≥0.75) but not with Biering-Sørensen scores.
conclusionsWell-controlled maximum back strength testing is feasible and reliable, and the scores are highly correlated with grip strength in lung transplant recipients shortly before hospital discharge. The Biering-Sørensen test should be limited to patients without dominant weakness and/or fear. Future research should investigate whether grip instead of back extension strength can safely be used for proper exercise prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.